The Portland Trail Blazers are leading in points per game (108.3) and points per 100 possessions (114.06). Their leading scorer is also the most active midrange player in the league by a fairly wide margin. From a recent Kirk Goldsberry article* regarding the Blazers' offensive effectiveness:
"So far this season, Aldridge has taken 339 midrange shots — repeatedly violating one of the key tenets of Morey’s efficiency-minded stratagem. As a team, Morey’s Rockets have tried only 292.
This midrange fascination is not new. Last season, Aldridge attempted 795 midrange shots, by far the most in the league (DeMar DeRozan was second with 628)."
Isn't this exactly what the analytics minded people decided is the worst way to structure an offense? Midrange shots are the worst shot in basketball, it's simple math they said. But here we are, at the dawning of a new year, and by every available measure -- advanced and otherwise -- the NBA's #1 offense is structured around the highest volume midrange shooter in the league.
Thoughts? Suggestions? How could such a thing happen when science had already solved the midrange riddle and decreed it dead?