Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Sports topic #2201935

Subject: "not surprised by niggas overreacting and bomani missing the point" Previous topic | Next topic
Basaglia
Member since Nov 30th 2004
49463 posts
Thu Jun-27-13 07:47 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
4. "not surprised by niggas overreacting and bomani missing the point"
In response to In response to 0


  

          


Reid literally wrote: "This ISN'T about the MERITS of body art. Wall, 22, has the right to put whatever he wants on his body, and one of the advantages of youth is that you can reinvent yourself."

He questioned Wall's flip-flopping on the issue of getting a tattoo, clearly suggesting that Wall is about to go buck fucking wild once he gets this contract...and he threw out Gilbert and Blatch as examples.

Now, I'm all for being indignant, but let's at least focus on what we supposed to be mad about.

Bomani just wasted a whole fuckin column arguing some shit that's not even the point.

Tatts are not the issue. It's Wall's state of mind on the eve of a big ass payday, the one he's been angling for since being drafted. And I do remember Wall carefully crafting a clean cut image for marketing purposes and saying he don't want tattoos. He coulda said he ain't want a gaudy ass luxury vehicle and Reid's column about Wall going back on his word about luxury vehicles would have been just as valid.

And let me be really clear, since niggas love being emotional: Argue Reid's actual fucking premise and put your emotions about athletes and tatts to the side. As for what I think about all this: I didn't care until Bomani wrote all that unnecessary shit and D12 and Birdman and Durant and Iverson, as if Reid didn't explicitly say tatts are not the issue...WALL CHANGING HIS STANCE on tatts is the issue, because it all looks calculated, like "NOPE...I'm bout to get maxed...fuck this marketing shit...I want my tatts now."

And, yes, I get that Wall was 19 when he said tatts would harm the marketing of his image. He was a kid and he has the right to flip-flop. I completely agree. And that's why I think Reid's column was trivial and unnecessary. However, I didn't think it was about tatts. I thought it was a clear shot as Wall's state of mind, that after a nice 6 week run, Wall thinks he's a superstar, max player now...and given the Wizards history, that's a bad sign of things to come. I don't agree with Reid on that, because John Wall isn't Gil or Blatch. However, At least I fucking understand what I'm disagreeing with.

____________________________________________________


Steph: I was just fooling about

Kyrie: I wasn't.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8OWNspU_yE

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote


Bomani shooting down all character assassination of John Wall (swipe) [View all] , BrooklynWHAT, Wed Jun-26-13 09:07 PM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
When I read that article I just dismissed it as some bullshit
Jun 26th 2013
1
yea i mean reid's piece did a good job of deading itself
Jun 27th 2013
2
thumbs up on the avi. thumbs way up
Jun 27th 2013
3
Reid's laying the ground work for a premise
Jun 27th 2013
5
dogg, i COMPLETELY agree...Reid's column was cheap. I dismissed it.
Jun 27th 2013
6
      Wall's a max by default... hell, he was a #1 pick by default
Jun 27th 2013
7
Here's The Thing
Jun 27th 2013
8

Lobby Okay Sports topic #2201935 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com