>then somehow attempt to use those contradictions to refute >Truths point about him not getting minutes/games .....because >he wasn't good enough? >the irony is you did that in a reply where your subject line >suggested HE was intellectually dishonest >lol >and we're the ones trolling? >k >
in golden state he wasn't getting tick because he was behind curry, ellis, acie law, reggie williams, and charlie bell. unless he was the second coming he wasn't going to play.
don't confuse "good" with "ready."
Larry Bird referenced Lance Stephenson as being the pacer's best player. he didn't play a lot his first 2 years. Didn't mean he wasn't good enough. He just wasn't ready at the time.
Houston, Morey has stated how much he didn't want to let Lin go. He needed to for Dalembert.
Peep D'Antoni and his stubbornness. And the fact that Melo has to repeatedly campaign for Lin to play. Not a question of talent.
so there's never been a time where it's been determined "Jeremy we can't play you because you stink."
one place he wasn't ready and there was a logjam one place had to let him go one place the coach was a fucking idiot (and continues to be)
and now he's here about to make the playoffs in his first year in the L.