Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #743366

Subject: "This was so good" Previous topic | Next topic
Walleye
Charter member
15277 posts
Wed Jan-19-22 10:45 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
12. "This was so good"
In response to In response to 0


          

Incredibly strong awareness of the political and social dynamics of the time period, which is ... rare for a move about the late middle ages. Getting the right mix of intense reaction to a rapidly changing world driven by:

-vast demographic shifts due to brutal mid-century plagues, most clearly visible in this story by the occasional allusion to rising labor costs

-immense tension between people in power desperate to preserve the authority of the foundation for that power, The Church, as it squanders that authority in a century bracketed by the *huge* overreach of "Unam Sanctam" and the crisis of legitimacy created by the papal schism

-VERY slowly shifting gender dynamics driven by increased lay (and female) participation in the culture of the church and spurred in the secular realm by increased literacy and consequent indulgence in non-religious literature (a point of connection between Jacques and Marguerite)

But it wasn't just an "I did my research" show and tell, though I'll happily admit that I'd be a HUGE sucker for something with way less of a compelling story if they get the historical context down so successfully. Rather, they integrated all of this into a narrative, making these characters, to varying degrees, subjects of history rather than agents of it. The story drives home how much of these heavily ceremonialized rule of law is driven by a barely-subtextual rule of power. It places Jean de Carrouges in a growing category of impoverished nobels and Marguerite in a growing category of women who had just enough agency to truly endanger their own lives.

AND they actually stopped periodically to make it funny with the subtly demented work of Alex Lawther as King Charles, who came to the throne at some absurdly young age and was ... exactly as normal as you'd expect a child king in the 14th century to be. Watching that actor struggle to keep a crown on his head, get distracted mid-sentence, and clap like a seal was completely wonderful and a totally beautiful reminder that the people who demand to rule us have been, pretty much since forever, absolute baby brains.

The different perspectives played really nicely, propped up by some great performances. Horrifying to watch but really skilled how even both of the accounts that were clearly *rape* (jean de carrouges' and marguerite's) actually played very differently, where the former really focused on Jacque's action as the rapist while the latter focused on Marguerite's own pain and terror. I loved the slight comedy sprinkled in as neither Jean nor Jacques was capable of telling their own account without ridiculous self-aggrandizement (former as loving husband and honest worker, latter as sexy and charming, self-made man of the world) that ultimately falls apart as they reveal what screwed up doofuses they are.

And Jodie Comer is terrific, playing all things to all people in each of the different versions and kind of slowly emerging as actually herself by the conclusion. Just a really smart, well-crafted movie that was apparently a giant flop? Man, I'm looking forward to our financial ministers of culture finally figuring out how distribution is going to look in the post-COVID world. I have preferences, obviously. I love movie theaters but I'm also really lazy so whatever. But it bums me out that I nearly missed this movie and assume there must be all kinds of good stuff that I'm missing for mostly silly reasons.

______________________________

"Walleye, a lot of things are going to go wrong in your life that technically aren't your fault. Always remember that this doesn't make you any less of an idiot"

--Walleye's Dad

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote


The Last Duel (Ridley Scott, Damon, Affleck 2021) [View all] , Sofian_Hadi, Mon Jan-17-22 06:05 PM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
This was incredibly good
Jan 17th 2022
1
Yeah. Sucks people didn't give it a chance.
Jan 18th 2022
3
I’m excited to watch this now. Thanks for the review
Jan 17th 2022
2
Quite liked it. Needed to end *one* scene sooner.
Jan 18th 2022
4
Hmmm. THE scene or another scene?
Jan 18th 2022
5
      the very last shot
Jan 18th 2022
6
           Oh, damn. I completely misread that. Lmao
Jan 18th 2022
7
           ^^^
Jan 19th 2022
9
                Yeah. He did the same thing with Kingdom of Heaven
Jan 19th 2022
10
im sorry but this movie fucking sucked
Jan 18th 2022
8
RE: im sorry but this movie fucking sucked
Jan 19th 2022
11
Ridley Scott is 84 years old.
Jan 20th 2022
13
      I'm totally behind the curve on this
Jan 21st 2022
15
           Watch Kingdom Of Heaven - Director's Cut
Jan 21st 2022
16
                That rules - thank you!
Jan 21st 2022
17
one word: BASURA
Jan 20th 2022
14

Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #743366 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com