>The decision to have those old actors to play there younger
>selves was just a terrible decision. Why do these older
>directors (thinking Scorcese and the Irishman) not want to
>give work to younger actors?!?! You telling me it made sense
>for Isiah Whitlock Jr. to play a younger version of himself
>rather than Roy Woods Jr.?
>

seemed like no effort to make them look believably young either. how old are they supposed to be in present time? they looked at least 40 in the flashbacks, more like 50. flashbacks were what 50+ years ago?

im telling myself that all the flashbacks were actually dreams of paul. he only has the reference of norman from back then so he stayed the same age but the rest of them are basically the present age in his dreams. sure that makes enough sense lol