Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #703497

Subject: "Len Wiseman directing, developing a Die Hard prequel. Yikes. *Swipe*" Previous topic | Next topic
bwood
Member since Apr 03rd 2006
8621 posts
Thu Oct-15-15 08:05 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"Len Wiseman directing, developing a Die Hard prequel. Yikes. *Swipe*"
Thu Oct-15-15 08:11 AM by bwood

          

http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2015/10/14/you-cant-make-this-shit-up-here-comes-a-die-hard-prequel

Die Hard has become such an interesting franchise: there's no way that anyone who got into Die Hard with the first film truly enjoys the later ones. Like, at all. But they make a bunch of money, so somebody is watching this horse crap upon which the holy Die Hard moniker is being slapped.

Fox has run the series into the ground - Die Hard At Chernobyl was just a fucking monstrosity - but that doesn't mean they're giving up! If they couldn't make us care about John McClane Jr (and since they cast Jai Courteney in the role, no, they could not make us care), they're going back to the start. No, not a reboot of Die Hard. Worse. A prequel to Die Hard.

Yes, Len Wiseman is coming on board to direct Die Hard 6, which will be a prequel featuring Bruce Willis in bookend pieces, reminiscing about his time as a cop in 1979 on the gritty streets of New York City. There are a lot of reasons why this is a terrible idea (prequel and Len Wiseman are more than enough reasons), but the worst thing about this is that Die Hard 6 is almost guaranteed to undercut Die Hard.

Here's why, and here's what Fox hasn't understood about Die Hard since With A Vengeance: John McClane is a regular dude. When he gets up to his neck in terrorists in Die Hard that is a totally unique, over-the-top event in his life. He was a normal beat cop before that - taking down street level thugs at best, probably securing crime scenes and walking a beat most of the time. He didn't have epic adventures before Nakatomi Plaza; that's the basis for why we like McClane in that movie - he's a regular guy in over his head! By having a prequel where something big happens (and a studio isn't signing off on this to make a prequel where John McClane does a couple of routine arrests) the series will be retroactively ruining the first film.

Of course you could always just not watch Die Hard With An Origin, but you know that you'll hear about it and you'll catch pieces of it on cable and the next time you watch Die Hard - the classic, unbeatable original - you'll have this little thing in the back of your head telling you "Oh, remember that time in 1979 when John McClane saved the president and diverted a nuke from New York City to the middle of the Atlantic in a giant bomber plane?"

It's worth noting that the great Howard Chaykin already wrote a Die Hard prequel in Boom Studios' comic Die Hard: Year One. That is much more street level and probably more interesting than anything Len Wiseman can come up with.

------------------------------------------
America from 9:00 on: https://youtu.be/GUwLCQU10KQ

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote


Len Wiseman directing, developing a Die Hard prequel. Yikes. *Swipe* [View all] , bwood, Thu Oct-15-15 08:05 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
Check out the replies to this tweet.
Oct 15th 2015
1
Die Hard IS Year One though smh
Oct 15th 2015
2
      It seems like most people don't want this due to the OG being a
Oct 15th 2015
3
           Yeah exactly
Oct 15th 2015
4
Eh, I liked Live Free or Die Hard
Oct 15th 2015
5
almost every single person agrees how ridiculous part 2 is
Oct 15th 2015
7
True.
Oct 16th 2015
12
      agreed about the "ruining" of the original
Oct 16th 2015
14
      RE: True.
Oct 17th 2015
20
           Street Level = Terrorist hijacking a yacht to blow it up
Oct 17th 2015
21
                Okay I just Googled the Year One storyline which is split into two volum...
Oct 18th 2015
24
Agree on 16 Blocks
Oct 15th 2015
9
agree...i liked all of 1-4...5 was a hot mess though
Oct 19th 2015
25
RE: Eh, I liked Live Free or Die Hard
Oct 21st 2015
28
Unless they get Bruce in it, this'll get scrapped, I'm convinced.
Oct 15th 2015
6
right? make whatever movie they had in mind just call it
Oct 15th 2015
8
people are gonna be pissed either way
Oct 16th 2015
10
That's what he did, though.
Oct 16th 2015
13
Sigh... Nope, I'll handle the synopsis for this one here:
Oct 16th 2015
11
Not gonna lie I'd probably pay to see that lol
Oct 16th 2015
16
ummm..I'm sold.:)
Oct 16th 2015
18
This is easily better than whatever crap H'wood will actually do
Oct 20th 2015
26
i loved the 1st one, and love all the rest just as much
Oct 16th 2015
15
ill gladly watch 2 and 3 but i dont love them
Oct 16th 2015
17
      I actually think the Sam Jack one is the best one
Oct 17th 2015
19
           ^Good point about nostalgia...
Oct 20th 2015
27
Why Len Wiseman?
Oct 18th 2015
22
He pitched the idea to the producer
Oct 18th 2015
23
This guy put his money where his mouth is.
Nov 09th 2015
29
Looks interesting to me.
Nov 09th 2015
30
Carl WInslow needs to be in it lol
Nov 10th 2015
31
Love this, should do that with my idea above.
Nov 11th 2015
32
      I'd be willing to contribute a few dollars to an ad for your idea
Nov 18th 2015
33

Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #703497 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com