42. "RE: OE here to tell y'all why SPIDERMAN 3 is going to be GARBAGE" In response to In response to 0
>1) You've finally realized that Kirsten Dunst is ugly.
lol i've known this from the get-go. this chick needs lips.
>3)They've violated the 'Batman Returns' rule: >TOO MANY GODDAMN CHARACTERS. C'mon, dun.
i question this too. when i heard about X-Men 3, i was wondering how they'd be able to fit all that story in one movie. they pulled it off though, so who knows, maybe Spidey3 will too.
>Then he'd slam someone and do that >boring leg drop shit and it was a rap. > >That's gonna be Spidey in this movie.
lol. just lol.
> >3)I must preface this with a no-homo, just because I got to. >Tobey Mcgwire is plain uninteresting to look at. His boyish >innocent I'm naive bullshit look on his face can't carry 3 >movies.
lol again. does a no homo null and void every degree of homoness? 'cause that's pretty high up there. hahaha jokes, fam.
>And real talk: Peter Parker's character isn't actually >written >very well. I know his appeal is that he's supposd to be a >"regular kid that everyone can relate to" and that's cool, >but >he's a grown man and I want to see some real views on >something.. >...I don't know, have a scene where the nigga recyles some >cans or >something..man up, bitch.
i couldn't agree more.
>And which one of y'all told me to see 300? That was some >April Fool's bullshit a month early, so fuck y'all.
yeah, 300 was waaaaaay overrated. if you take it for what it was--a visually pleasing movie and nothing else--then it was good. but people talk as if it's braveheart or some shit.