Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #467969

Subject: "Finally seen all of it" Previous topic | Next topic
Duval Spit
Member since Jan 21st 2009
3355 posts
Tue Sep-01-09 11:53 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
45. "Finally seen all of it"
In response to In response to 0


  

          

Let me preface by saying that I work at a movie theatre,
so while I haven't sat down and watched it straight through,
I have, as of today, seen the entire thing.
Most of it multiple times.

That being said:
This is not a bad movie.
It is, in fact, a very well made movie.
But that doesn't mean I care one way or another about seeing it again.

Nora Ephron did a good job. The script is good, the directing is good.
Amy Adams did a good job. She is normal, and doesn't make you completely hate this narcissistic and obsessed woman, which would be very easy to do.
Julie's husband was also effective and normal.
But that's the problem - everything felt a little too real. The say that theater is life under a microscope. If that is true, Nora pulled in way too close. The ONLY thing she focused on was Julie's obsession with Julia and it really made her seem like a loon. But a loon that you work with.
Note to all future film-writers: blogs are not a good subject for a movie.

The Julia part, however, is much better. Meryl was excellent at making a cartoon character seem like a real woman, and Stanley Tucci, as always, was great.
Her struggles were much more palpable than Julie's because it felt like she was actually trying to achieve something.

If I wanted to read into this movie,
the obvious parallel would be to see how women have progressed in terms of their own standards of accomplishment. The only problem is that it doesn't feel as if Julie really accomplished anything. She was successful, that is true, but her level of heartache and effort as compared to Julia's seemed miniscule.
Maybe that's a problem with our society, but it comes off as a problem in the movie.
Ephron does an excellent job intertwining Julie and Julia's lives,
but at the end of the day I still wished it had been a Julia Child biopic.

At the end of the movie I felt like nothing had been done,
that the story had gone nowhere.
It EASILY could be trimmed,
as some of the troubles they each go through become a bit repetitive,
but making it shorter wouldn't have made it much better.

At the end of the day,
the movie had all the right ingredients,
but the final product just didn't taste great.

And yes,
I did end with a food metaphor.

<----

Larry Otis!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeM89CITvMc

and his free new singles, produced by Tough Junkie!
http://soundcloud.com/toughjunkie/sets/larry-otis-leaks

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote


So we just gonna ignore the GOAT & GOAT in Training huh? (Julie & Julia) [View all] , ZooTown74, Sun Aug-09-09 11:04 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
you think amy adams looks better than katherine heigl?
Aug 09th 2009
1
Yep
Aug 09th 2009
2
Pretty much.
Aug 09th 2009
6
Cosign.
Aug 09th 2009
7
She looks like Pam from the office & I thought y'all wasnt feelin Pam.
Aug 10th 2009
19
she def acts better, but looks better? really?
Aug 10th 2009
12
yeah I'm gonna have to say no on that one
Aug 10th 2009
17
      i'm saying tho...
Aug 10th 2009
21
           I listed ACTING 3 times. Awesome focus, fellas.
Aug 10th 2009
22
                and you said looks twice
Aug 10th 2009
24
                *counts*
Aug 10th 2009
25
                     don't really matter.
Aug 10th 2009
26
                          Yeah... "It don't really matter... but I'll bring it up anyway"
Aug 10th 2009
27
                               damn. you really going to keep on, aren't you?
Aug 10th 2009
28
                                    Yeah, thanks for letting us know how you really feel.
Aug 10th 2009
29
                                    RE: damn. you really going to keep on, aren't you?
Aug 11th 2009
33
                                         *pumps fist*
Aug 11th 2009
34
                huh? i agree that amy's a better actor, that's why i didn't mention it.
Aug 10th 2009
31
                     So you should have said that off break.
Aug 11th 2009
35
                          ummmmm seriously, dude: HUH?!?
Aug 11th 2009
36
                               I see you still want to argue semantics and shit.
Aug 11th 2009
37
i can back this. great thread.
Aug 09th 2009
3
A+ post
Aug 09th 2009
4
agreed. goatit is so beautiful and talented. n/m
Aug 09th 2009
5
My girl saw it. Loved the Julia parts, was indifferent on the Julie part...
Aug 09th 2009
8
Bored privileged white chick searching for meaning in her life....PASS
Aug 10th 2009
11
What book?
Aug 23rd 2009
43
      Julie's blog didn't focus on Julia as much.
Aug 24th 2009
44
You think people are gonna give a damn about Julie & Julia?
Aug 09th 2009
9
They cared enough about Trout Face Heigl to make a SEPERATE post
Aug 10th 2009
10
i would take amy adams to so many steak dinners.
Aug 10th 2009
13
Yeah, Meryl is fucking bulletproof
Aug 10th 2009
14
co sign
Aug 13th 2009
40
I saw it this weekend with my b/f and we both enjoyed it
Aug 10th 2009
15
I'm interested in watching half of that movie
Aug 10th 2009
16
saw it w/ the gf yesterday
Aug 10th 2009
18
is this another TDWP for the GOAT?
Aug 10th 2009
20
*waits for further post derailments*
Aug 10th 2009
23
I see Will decided to explode
Aug 10th 2009
30
.
Aug 11th 2009
32
The "Julia" part of the movie looks interesting
Aug 11th 2009
38
Wonderful film... Streep is MAJOR.
Aug 13th 2009
39
im just glad
Aug 14th 2009
41
Fun movie. Streep should get Oscar consideration.
Aug 16th 2009
42

Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #467969 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com