|
>Iron Man had an excellent lead performance, excellent action, >humor, and solid supporting performances, but the villain(s) >were weak. We got relatively anonymous Arab terrorists and >JEff Bridges with a shaved head. And they didn't do much to >make me care about Stane. Furthermore, I've always hated the >Tony Stark "fake heart" aspect of the character, and that goes >for the film as well. Like, realy, the guy's a billionaire and >he can't afford open heart surgery? > >Batman had a damn good lead performance, the best action of >any of the films, a solid to excellent supporting cast (minus >the usually excellent Gyllenhall), humor, and the best villain >out of all the films. The drawbacks: the bat-voice is still >fucking ridiculous. I never got the hub-bub about the majority >of the supposed plot-holes, I've now watched it many, many >times and it holds together to me. > >Again, not taking anything away from Iron Man, but it's still >Dark Knight. It's one of those movies that made a shitload of >money and deserved it. > >As for theother two, Hulk was just fine, and I haven't seen >Hellboy 2.
|