Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #463854

Subject: "Do you think audiences would reject 60 minute movies?" Previous topic | Next topic
stylez dainty
Member since Nov 22nd 2004
6742 posts
Wed Jul-22-09 11:23 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"Do you think audiences would reject 60 minute movies?"


  

          

I watched the old classic "The Most Dangerous Game" the other night. It was about 62 minutes long and extremely enjoyable. I thought how for a lot of comedies/thrillers/action movies/rom-coms/horror movies, an hour would probably be just about right for the movie to not overstay its welcome and keep you engaged throughout.

I'm pretty sure people would balk at paying the same price and I doubt they'd ever lower ticket prices for certain films, which might end up being just as expensive to make, since the stuff that would get excised would most likely be cost-effective filler, but man, I think it would make for much better popcorn films in many cases.

Hell, if anyone can school me on why 90 minutes became the standard, that would be really interesting.


----
I check for: Serengeti, Zeroh, Open Mike Eagle, Jeremiah Jae, Moka Only.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote


Do you think audiences would reject 60 minute movies? [View all] , stylez dainty, Wed Jul-22-09 11:23 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
For how much movie tickets cost, HELL YES!
Jul 22nd 2009
1
forreal. i'm payin $8, i want a fuckin 2 hour movie.
Jul 22nd 2009
7
      They'd have to cut the ticket cost, which could bring more people in
Jul 22nd 2009
9
      you're lucky you're only paying $8.
Jul 23rd 2009
26
      $8??? goddamn... i pay at least $11 every time
Jul 23rd 2009
27
           Fuck that, for $11 I want 2 movies.
Jul 23rd 2009
29
Do you realize how bad Andy Rooney would look in IMAX?
Jul 22nd 2009
2
Nowadays, all the Aliens are fighting all the predators, and I'm sick of...
Jul 22nd 2009
3
Why a bus? And why 55 miles per hour? I'm sleepy!
Jul 22nd 2009
4
LOL
Jul 22nd 2009
11
you asked for some history on the 90 minute standard
Jul 22nd 2009
5
No idea it was such a recent standard
Jul 22nd 2009
6
Except movies have been getting longer.
Jul 22nd 2009
8
Replies make me think it might be related to ticket prices
Jul 22nd 2009
10
I hate to say it, but so do I
Jul 22nd 2009
12
With a lot of blockbusters, even okay ones, I'm waiting for it to end
Jul 22nd 2009
13
television also has a different pay model
Jul 22nd 2009
20
I don't think it's about quality
Jul 22nd 2009
16
      think of it in terms of a date
Jul 22nd 2009
21
not to be rude
Jul 22nd 2009
18
      This was not unheard of at all.
Jul 23rd 2009
28
110-120 minute films can be as formulaic (structured) as 90 min. ones
Jul 22nd 2009
15
      but there's at least some wiggle room
Jul 22nd 2009
22
           RE: but there's at least some wiggle room
Jul 23rd 2009
25
If these shorter movies had lower ticket prices, I think people
Jul 22nd 2009
14
Unless we're talking double features and bringing back A/B films,
Jul 22nd 2009
17
these are popping up all over NYC again
Jul 22nd 2009
23
I damn sure would n/m
Jul 22nd 2009
19
speaking of short movies, Tadpole was pretty good
Jul 22nd 2009
24
I liked that one as well. I've been impressed with Aaron Stanford.
Jul 23rd 2009
30
sure if they were either (A)Cheaper or (B) Double Features
Jul 23rd 2009
31

Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #463854 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com