25. "RE: What exactly is your definition of a thinking republican?" In response to In response to 23
>You prolly feel there aren't any thinking republicans...which >is fine I guess.
I didn't say that. I just don't hear any intellectual arguments from the republicans on the Bill Maher panel. Andrew Sullivan can do it - but only when he's arguing gay rights. Chrisotpher Hitchens might be able to do it - if he was a republican, not drunk, and not spewing hate on the Clintons.
>Brookhiser is a perfect example of one. Amy holmes, aside from >her looks is just about useless. I won't argue that. But >brookhiser is the ideal conservative to have on there.
The guy who smoked pot who was it had no psychotropic effects on him? Hard to say if he'd be okay because of Amy Holmes parroting of the talking points when he was speaking. At least he could say something and then listen when someone else is responding. That makes him betetr than John Fund for sure.
>That show has the propensity of being unwatchable when there's >3 liberals on the panel
I disagree - it's often funnier.
I think one republican , one democrat, and one celebrity is the best line up they can have.