12. "I really don't understand anyone not understanding why not" In response to In response to 11
It's already been stated a few times in this thread
>There's no way the film is going to be in depth enough.
And the film doesn't have to be. Sometimes less is more.
>Second off, the film is going to ruin the ability for you to >imagine the book without scenes from the film and each actor's >particular take on the character influencing your reading of >the book.
False. And even if this was true, I couldn't care less.
>An all around L.
Nope. This stance you're taking is tho. Believe it or not, some of us are able to enjoy a movie w/o having to read the book first. And like thoughtprocess stated above. Sometimes reading the book after the fact improves the experience.
>My wife is reading it right now and is up to about Chapter 4 >or 5 and is already saying how surprisingly good it is.
That's great. But that doesn't mean it's the right choice for eveyone.