81. "The problem with your and the authors ''objective'' definition..." In response to In response to 76
...is that what type of term would be used for acts that are known for one song and nothing else? I know such a term:One hit wonder and it's effective and it works even if there are some tiny problems as I explained in my post but in MOST cases, people totally get it...
Meanwhile, if you put the likes of Hendrix and Grateful Dead in the same category as Nena, Kaoma or the Trashmen, the term loses all its meaning beyond the objective one which frankly isn't particularly significant IMO...
That an author needs an objective definition to make his work "academically" correct is another thing, however, in conversations, I see no need for such an "objectivity".
BTW, aren't you the guy who defended the right to use "old school" on a context basis? *There*, I am more for a strict definition... Interesting (not really but still)...