Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby The Lesson topic #2866207

Subject: "RE: songs produced between 2000-2004 sounded like they cost money. " Previous topic | Next topic
double 0
Member since Nov 17th 2004
7010 posts
Sun Jan-19-14 01:27 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
6. "RE: songs produced between 2000-2004 sounded like they cost money. "
In response to In response to 0


          

Hmmm...

Well 2000-2004 they were still mixing pro tools and cutting to 2" Tape. The songs definitely have a tape sound.

I think macklemore is a bad example because that record is mixed pretty fucking good.

I'd say the rise in soft synths have changed things as well. Back in those days you'd record the sounds off the mpc and outboard gear (keyboards) into the computer through a pre amp. So even recording in gives you a better sound.

If you were to listen to all dr luke records they still do this which is why all their shit is so big.

Double 0
DJ/Producer/Artist
Producer in Kidz In The Hall
-------------------------------------------
twitter: @godouble0
IG: @godouble0
www.thinklikearapper.com

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote


songs produced between 2000-2004 sounded like they cost money. [View all] , Joe Corn Mo, Sat Jan-18-14 06:56 PM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
Interesting
Jan 18th 2014
1
which reminds me, whatever happened to snare drums?
Jan 18th 2014
2
The Good life - Faith Evans (2001)
Jan 18th 2014
3
the budgets are gone
Jan 19th 2014
4
Pro Tools has been around A LOT longer than people realize
Jan 19th 2014
5
when you say 2 inch tape, do you mean like a reel to reel?
Jan 19th 2014
7
RE: when you say 2 inch tape, do you mean like a reel to reel?
Jan 19th 2014
8

Lobby The Lesson topic #2866207 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com