Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby General Discussion topic #13452689

Subject: "Because our other adversaries are watching. Very Closely " Previous topic | Next topic
Amritsar
Member since Jan 18th 2008
31291 posts
Tue Feb-08-22 09:54 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
40. "Because our other adversaries are watching. Very Closely "
In response to In response to 35


  

          

China will be emboldened to attack Taiwan. And Don’t get me started on Iran

We should also stand with (real) democratic countries fighting for their sovereignty. They have a right to join us and our NATO Allie’s if they want to. I also personally do not want Ukraine to go the way of Belarus and Lukashenko.

I do not support war. That’s ridiculous. But I understand the global hegemony and the stakes at play here.

To the TYT Intercept crowd, America will always be in the wrong I guess.

Jacobin is a fucking joke to serious politicos.



>with that article you link, apart from your disagreement??
>The history and context laid out by the author is correct, and
>you're calling it agitprop but socialism isn't mentioned once
>talk more of promoted throughout the entire piece.
>
>Furthermore, it was published late Dec 2021 and since then the
>current US admin has deployed thousands more troops to the
>region plus adopted a posture so incendiary that the pres of
>Ukraine himself has asked the West to chill lol
>(https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/01/28/ukraine-russia-us-nato-putin-macron/,
>https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60174684). This would
>suggest that the author's concerns/predictions about where
>American saber-rattling could lead are quite valid.
>
>If you support war, you could just say that. A journalist
>explaining (and applying a critical lens to) historical facts
>unflattering to the US isn't de facto socialist propaganda
>tho.
>
>
>
>>
>>Ana Kasparian, Kyle kulinski and these other influencer
>bros
>>openly questioning our ties to NATO right now. Talking as
>if
>>WE are the aggressors here
>>
>>Jacobin mag basically running with Russian agitprop right
>now:
>>https://jacobinmag.com/2021/12/united-states-russia-war-ukraine
>>
>

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote


A Serious Post About The 'Progressive' Approach To Politics [View all] , Reeq, Thu Jan-27-22 05:51 PM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
dont mind if i do
Jan 27th 2022
1
you kind of proved his point
Jan 27th 2022
2
Show me the law that says there can only be 2 parties
Jan 27th 2022
3
      Duverger’s Law is PoliSci 101
Jan 27th 2022
4
      Again, I fully agree with everything you are saying
Jan 28th 2022
12
           because there is none
Feb 08th 2022
38
                *nods furiously*
Feb 08th 2022
39
how do you amass political power without amassing political power?
Jan 28th 2022
5
You refer to AOC as 'my boo'
Jan 28th 2022
6
I don't under the "Dems Suck" strategy
Jan 28th 2022
7
I worked for Bernie in 2016
Feb 04th 2022
16
      in what capacity?
Feb 04th 2022
18
      Bree is insufferable
Feb 04th 2022
20
           how so? It's interesting how Black women like Briahna
Feb 04th 2022
22
From a centrist dickhead? No thanks.
Jan 28th 2022
8
lmao
Jan 28th 2022
9
Bernie is trash tho....nm
Feb 04th 2022
17
^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This times a million (nm)
Jan 28th 2022
11
I'll bite
Jan 28th 2022
10
They need to get better at lying
Jan 28th 2022
13
is it more on the establishment to get their shit together tho?
Feb 03rd 2022
14
I think you nailed what dude is trying to do
Feb 04th 2022
21
      I appreciate reeq. my reply wasn't really about him
Feb 04th 2022
25
           RE: I appreciate reeq. my reply wasn't really about him
Feb 05th 2022
27
The whole progressive movement is a scam
Feb 04th 2022
15
Dems control everything and progressives are the scam?
Feb 04th 2022
23
"Scam" would seem to imply people are making money
Feb 04th 2022
24
moderates are expected to win with the money they raise tho.
Feb 04th 2022
26
      nina turner grifter ?
Feb 05th 2022
30
      This is *very* telling:
Feb 05th 2022
31
      Ok. and what are their large $$ Donors expecting them to
Feb 05th 2022
32
      lol, is this real?
Feb 06th 2022
33
wrong. the 'moderate' movement is the real scam
Feb 08th 2022
37
This had potential - but your approach is disingenuous
Feb 04th 2022
19
It becomes dangerous when they veer into foreign policy too
Feb 05th 2022
28
cosplay opposition.
Feb 05th 2022
29
Yep. Somehow they’re experts on every story too
Feb 07th 2022
34
Not a fan of Ana,Kyle,Jacobin,or Putin, but what exactly is the problem
Feb 07th 2022
35
     
           just want to reiterate everyhing i said pre-invasion still applies
May 20th 2022
47
pessimistic about Nina round 2, I think Fetterman wins in PA
Feb 08th 2022
36
Briahna defending Tucker Carlson1?!?
May 19th 2022
41
She’s insufferable
May 19th 2022
42
But this is a new turn for her right?!?!
May 19th 2022
43
I am shocked
May 20th 2022
46
This is a 18 minute long segment. Did you watch all of it?
May 20th 2022
51
Bernie's approach is not progressive. Progression doesn't look
May 19th 2022
44
When did he insist this?
May 20th 2022
45
the moderates control everything. Even the progressives.
May 20th 2022
48
I think this idea of immediate gratification is a dream.
May 20th 2022
49
      The democrat moderates in office are
May 20th 2022
50

Lobby General Discussion topic #13452689 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com