auragin_boi Member since Aug 01st 2003 20939 posts
Thu Nov-18-21 09:52 AM
57. "No, it would not fall under this description" In response to In response to 49
This clause is meant to prevent companies from discriminating against people that might increase their benefits spend due to something pre-existing.
Vaccine refusal is not pre-existing or related to genetics and therefore does not qualify under this clause. Now what IS protected is discrimination based on a medical condition which prevents someone from getting vaccinated. Which most companies are not doing.