>I gave a clear and direct statement. I don't require your >approval of support. But, if you're going to argue for the >sake of the activity, you can do that in the mirror.
I was simply trying to aid your reading comprehension. There's no need to be so defensive. It's not productive.
>> > >You don't know his thoughts and he's more than capable of >articulating this objections or clarification freely. So, you >can stop assuming and stop trying to clarify your random >confusion. Now, if he wants to cosign your assumption, then >cool, that's his prerogative. But until then, you're just >talking for the sake of words. Have a good day.
If you don't want to address his straightforward query, that's fine. I'm sorry for trying to help you, Jerome.