>Based on your response to call his friends, which includes >his brother, awful human beings because they didn't realise >that this time was different to all the other times he acted >stupid instead of following through and being stupid. >
I gave a clear and direct statement. I don't require your approval of support. But, if you're going to argue for the sake of the activity, you can do that in the mirror.
>He thought that was callous and lacked empathy for their >situation, and so wondered where the empathy was for them. I >imagine he's still wondering when his question will be >answered. >
You don't know his thoughts and he's more than capable of articulating this objections or clarification freely. So, you can stop assuming and stop trying to clarify your random confusion. Now, if he wants to cosign your assumption, then cool, that's his prerogative. But until then, you're just talking for the sake of words. Have a good day.