Everywhere I turn I see (mostly white women) commenting on how Hillary has the support of the "minority voter" - while they allege that Bernie Sanders is too pale for the white house and not a candidate for minorities. Huh?

Let's recap a few things:

-Sanders has been fighting for income equality and criminal justice reform long before Hillary ever even thought about these issues

-Sanders marched with civil rights activists and resisted segregation in 1964 while Hillary worked for Barry Goldwater's conservative campaign which largely ran on galvanizing the country *against* the Civil Rights Act

-Sanders voted against the "Defense of (traditional) Marriage Act" and fought for nationwide marriage equality in 1996. Hillary Clinton was still against gay marriage and marriage equality as of 2005.

-Sanders strongly opposed the Iraq invasion and vilification of muslims while Hillary fell in line w/ the status quo and supported the oligarchy's invasion of the middle-east.

-Sanders was the first senator to decline to attend Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's absurd speech to Congress earlier this year while Hillary Clinton was nowhere to be found, likely somewhere posturing in a political bunker waiting to calculate, calculate, calculate.

The list could go on and on....

So, as this narrative continues to get spun ad nauseum - my question is: where might they do that at?

-->