|
>I am not separate to the universe, nor is my brain. >
great. neither is mine. where does that get us?
that we are all connected and I am a part of you and we are only seperated by illusionary social constructs? fine. but you still can't move my arm... or read my thoughts, so for all intents and purposes, we are seperate.
your brain is not a magical portal that holds all the secrets to the universe. not really.
you won't find your answers this way. you will go on and on in meaningless circles.
>There are also only two sexes. Some animals possess the power >of both, but there is only two. We cannot even conceive of a >sex that does not fit into the Male & Female duality. >
You're still stuck on the idea that there are 2 biological human sexes, but there are more than 2 genders. the world is bigger than your brain. in fact, our society pushes against the idea of multiple genders because their human brain keeps trying to cram everything into neat, bianary systems.
which is another reason this mystical shit played out for me. it's just another box and the world doesn't fit neatly in it.
>>it's an evolutionary throwback. > >It's not *just* that. > >> >>that why we group things together in twos (or threes). > >You will find profound realities, which exist here, outside of >our "human" understanding in two's, not three's. However, we >are still from this universe, so the fact that our brain see's >so many dual relationships is a completely natural, and >organic observation. Our DNA is a double helix, electrons have >positive and negative charges, most of our organs and senses >which allow life to procreate only come in two as well. These >things exist beyond "human" definition or pattern recognition, >or pattern invention. How many arms do you have? How many >legs? how many eyes? Just think about it. These are innate >realities. > > >>Life and death, etc. > >Life and death is not a human invention or metaphor. It is a >reality. > > >>which is what I suspect you are doing right now. >>I can recognize it because I used to do the same thing. >> > >You are not seeing my point yet, but you will. The question I >am asking is: "Why is dualism the underlying foundation for >our experience of living and dying and everything that we >understand or observe about the universe?" > >
I see your point perfectly fine. I answered it years ago.
You ASSUME dualism is the underlying foundation for your experience of living and dying because your brain fixates on things in pairs.
there's nothing more to it than that.
you will not stumble upon the universal theory of relativity if you keep looking for these round numbers.
chaos theory already proved that the universe doesn't care about round numbers as much as humans do.
this post would be better if you shifted your fixation to the occurrance of irrational numbers in some of our models for the universe.
that's more interesting than this pseudoscience from the overly romanticized mystery schools of greece/ egypt.
|