Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby General Discussion topic #13493965

Subject: "PRO's were born of the reluctance to unionize..." Previous topic | Next topic
CyrenYoung
Charter member
34204 posts
Mon Nov-06-23 04:33 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
5. "PRO's were born of the reluctance to unionize..."
In response to In response to 3
Mon Nov-06-23 04:39 PM by CyrenYoung

  

          

..While they're not "unions", they perform the task of organized collection & distribution of earnings/royalties, while maintaining certain standards regarding licensed performances.

*Please note: The challenges being faced during that era are very similar to modern times.

Back then, unions weren't viewed in the same perspective (esp for minorities). There were legitimate concerns regarding fair negotiation practices and regulation.

Crazy that so many musicians bolted from ASCAP for fear of unfair practices, only to join BMI (ironically, a PRO created by broadcasters --- the true monopoly).


*skatin' the rings of saturn*


..and miles to go before i sleep...

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote


Why are music contracts so bad if they have unions? [View all] , seasoned vet, Mon Nov-06-23 03:28 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
Mainly because the industry as a whole isn't unionized...
Nov 06th 2023
1
This is all spot on. At this point the only real benefits from
Nov 06th 2023
2
I don't think of PROs as unions. Yeah they negotiate rates
Nov 06th 2023
3
YOU HATE ALL MUSICIANS!!! j/k, thank you for the insight.
Nov 06th 2023
4
      Musicians are people too... lol
Nov 06th 2023
6

Lobby General Discussion topic #13493965 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com