45. "You're talking about all of humanity vs a racist republic." In response to In response to 44
>In the 80s people took crazy amount of steroids and broke all >kinds of world records and didn't amazing feats of athleticism >... then their bodies broke down.
This is a fact with no point attached. According to this discussion, I would assume you're saying they did this for America in the Olympics, but I can't be sure.
>When you're dealing with humans, living in a world that came >millions of years before them and will last millions of years >after them maximizing the good for only a small number of >people is not in the best interest of the planet or the >species.
Some might argue that a good president does what's best for his country, not the planet or the species. This is how white supremacist logic appears to operate... and the country was founded by white supremacists. I want to reiterate that this is how you and I feel, of course, but I think it's important to keep in mind that this view isn't as common as many of us wish it was. White people would seriously destroy this planet and move to Mars before following higher moral principles for the sake of respecting non-white people.
>Eradicating cultures, humans, species, and ecosystems in the >name of money and dominance is objectively bad.
Of course I agree.
>Sodas are bad for me. I drink sodas anyways. Even if I was >the CEO of Pepsi, sodas would still be bad for me. They'd just >personally enrich me.
Bad comparison. In this analogy, America would be the Pepsicola institution or your bank account... which the purchase and highly probable consumption of Pepsi would always be good for... yet still bad for humanity.