|
We see how that worked out. So, like Keith Richards said, rock was new and it was the first time it was going to have a generation take it into middle and late age. They seem to have done it respectively. So I guess Jay and them can do the same, even though by and large, the lyrical content of rap back then doesn't always lend itself to later age respectability. But then again, neither does Monkey Man or Midnight Rambler. And those are highlighted in current tours. Billy Eiliish needs to recognize that there's a lot of lying in rock.And for the record I hate having to just use Jay as the representative in these discussions.
>just because a rock group is old means it's loved > >some shit is considered mad joke-y or low class like hair >metal > >but thats not really answering the question > >hard to say. I mean, in Rock you do your homework and look at >the old greats (to generalize) > >and in rap, you say fuck the past, I'mma do ME. and you just >burn what came before or your kill the king to become the >king > >buuuut, then there are lots of exceptions. some new rappers >studied the greats and came to a conclusion that while the >greats are great, building on what they built is not always >the way to paper. I'm like both surprised and NOT surprised >when I find out X new rapper, mumble rapper, trap person was >known for spitting tight rhymes in highschool or being a >backpacker back in the day (ahem, Lil' Uzi Vert, Will.I.Am, >etc)
|