I imagine it depends on the policy/situation. I'm spacing my macro class and that was probably too long ago to be relevant lol.
I just wasn't 100% clear on what he meant exactly. I assumed he was referring to states like Kansas, etc that the GOP fucked...but wasn't sure exactly what he meant.
The tough part about calling it a "good" economy isn't just issues with unemployment, underemployment, etc. Its the % of gains that go to the top, which the tax cuts are going to only make worse.
I think Dems could make that argument depending on the candidate.
I work for a large company that benefited from that cut. Not a nickel went to employees. No new investments. Nothing. In fact, insurance premiums went up. I'm sure that is more common than not. There has to be an argument/case there for dems to make.