>Ev'rybody say "nothin' comes too easy...."
>
>When you got it baby nothin' comes too hard
>
>
>
>uh...........
>
>yeah to counter that Tanya Tucker/Prince "baby I'm a star"
>stuff about "coming too easy", I heard Bishop Jakes say "what
>is love without a fight/struggle?" (something like that). Todd
>Smith weighed in with:
>
>I can't sit and wait, for my princess to arrive
>I gotta struggle and fight, to keep my dream alive
>
>
>but that was more about "looking for prospects" and not
>seemingly dealing with what's right there in front of you.
>
>
>So........
>
>Is having "game" necessary to make the "meeting stage" go
>"easy" or the "meeting stage" will just go easy for two people
>when it's "right"? But is having game masking whether or not
>two people "really" belong together?
>
>
>(To those who are inclined to JUMP....this is about EXPLORING
>a topic, not something I'm desperate for a solution/answer - I
>found the Tanya Tucker song "interesting" when contrasted with
>the Prince and Bishop Jakes statement/lyric and I was
>interested in EXPLORING.....not desperate for an
>"answer/solution")

there's no one answer to this. its timing, circumstances, and does the opportunity present itself.

its easy as hell if all those things line up. they have to line up for both parties though.

if they only align for one person, it'll be a struggle bus to continue. although it can still happen. however, not as likely.

for relationships to continue, there will be some struggle. hard to have a longer-term situation with no fighting/arguments/disagreements. how they're handled makes all the difference.

its when those disagreements become potential deal breakers or are handled wrong, that someone's feeling get hurt. relationship altering decisions might come out it. then it becomes do both parties want to stick it out or is this hill really a Mt. Everest issue.

Y'all buy those labels, I was born supreme