either stating;

1. how can we trust polls if the polls were wrong about predicting Hillar's win?

2. how can we trust polls with such a small sample size (sample sizes are normally about 2500 which is supposed to be enough people to capture relevant and statistically significant numbers)

3. the people who run polls are liberals and liberals are lying liars so why should we trust anything these lying ass liberals have to say?


at this point I think I have their way of thinking down. Sources have to be crystal clear and kind of dumbed down for them to accept facts

***********************************************************
https://soundcloud.com/swageyph/yph-die-with-me