don't let your (and sometimes our) disdain of hyperprogressive idiocy lead you to reductionist bullshit

if 2 separate groups arrive at the same/similar solution to 2 different agendas...it doesn't invalidate the solution nor does arriving at the same answer warrant anything other than further scrutiny

anti-intervention solves both the xenophobic nationalists (who don't mind intervention when it promotes that agenda) vs idealists who prefer to the U.S. to quit bullying the world (out of a peaceful ideology or simply to quit angering the extremists/terrorists)

they don't like Jews

the others don't like our undying support of Israel bc we're using them as a chess piece in the middle east

i personally think anti-intervention is futile at this point and a bit naive but i think it's something to aim for as a gradual shift in foreign policy

Let me sport my Air Hyperbole 2010s in peace. (c) ansomble

Building repetoires (c) spm since 1983