Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby General Discussion topic #12939876

Subject: "Up to a certain point the quality was good" Previous topic | Next topic
ConcreteCharlie
Member since Nov 21st 2002
71387 posts
Mon Dec-07-15 12:27 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
2. "Up to a certain point the quality was good"
In response to In response to 0


  

          

You look at the stuff from the early and mid 2000s, it's pretty true to the original and the new colors, for a while, actually had *better* materials than the originals (e.g. Laney 5, navy 1, burgundy 5, Olympic 6, etc).

By 2010 things had really slipped and ultimately got really bad. They didn't put the same air units in the last round of OG 11 colors and the gamma blues, for example. Lots of spotty quality on the uppers and what not. Missing details like the 3M on the black/red 13s.

Now they are doing this "remastered" thing but you'd think the idea would be an improvement on the original but instead they are kind of between the spotty quality and the top quality. The price keeps going up though.

Let's not romanticize the originals too much either, on a lot of them they used pretty cheap leather though not as junky as some of the retros.

The thing I would like to see is a marriage of the old styles and the current performance technology. Imagine all the classic Js, reworked with improved fit (nothing crazy, no visible Flywire or anything and still leather/nubuck) and unlocked Zoom, flight plates, Air Max insoles and other stuff they have used recently. That would be amazing to me. But there is a purist streak against that, even though they issue ugly ass hybrids of Js all the time and do exactly what I am talking about with the Air Max line every year.

And you will know MY JACKET IS GOLD when I lay my vengeance upon thee.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote


Sneakerheads: most of these Jordan retros are trash, right? [View all] , John Forte, Mon Dec-07-15 11:35 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
i wouldnt consider them trash and i havent had any issues with comfort.....
Dec 07th 2015
1
Actual performance Jordan's would be the shit
Dec 07th 2015
3
The 72-10s are legit as far as quality
Dec 07th 2015
4
My wife just now clowned me
Dec 07th 2015
7
not trash just not the original materials...
Dec 07th 2015
5
my 3's are ok...
Dec 07th 2015
6
definitely skippers. the prices just too high
Dec 07th 2015
18
Anything after the 10s are iffy
Dec 07th 2015
8
I posted before I read this. I totally agree.
Dec 07th 2015
12
the quality is pretty good now actually. nike stepped it up.
Dec 07th 2015
9
in the past year or two there was a definite noticeable improvement
Dec 07th 2015
10
      My last purchase was 2014, and they are not nice
Dec 07th 2015
13
           ya it was def after that
Dec 07th 2015
17
If we keepin 100 the OG Jorns weren't all that comfy either*
Dec 07th 2015
11
Some of the color ways are cool but they look shoddy in realtime
Dec 07th 2015
14
niggas still care bout jordans?? thought that was fk boy shit
Dec 07th 2015
15
^wears Keds^
Dec 07th 2015
16
      nigga my daughter 15 and she know Js is played
Dec 07th 2015
19
           damn both of y'all some bammas then
Dec 07th 2015
20
           idgaf
Dec 07th 2015
21
           props that your daughter's not into Jordans.
Dec 07th 2015
22
           Lol you on that good dope.
Dec 07th 2015
23

Lobby General Discussion topic #12939876 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com