>so what? it's still a chance to be the star, kick ass, look >cool etc.
But the manner in which you phrased it made it seem that b/c Wiseman is her fiance that it would've been incumbent upon her to take the role whereas there was NO involvement whatsoever prior to shooting...
>which is exactly my point.
B/c you're not bein' offered A-list roles nor anything as interesting as McDormand (in this instance)...
>but they've also both been in way more movies that have >higher aspirations than just your run of the mill mutliplex >fare.
I'm not disputing their talent - they've also been in stinkers nevertheless...
>i love how you convienently igonred those other names. >Scorsese and DiCaprio. i'm not saying that this movie is >gonna be Goodfellas, but it's clear that it won't be Varsity >Blues either.
I ignored them simply b/c of this - DiCaprio I think has talent, but he's coasting these days - his name alone won't suffice in drawing me to see a film - same for Scorsese - he's better off as a film historian at this juncture of his career as evident w/ his exploration of Italian and American cinema... They're at this point - *whatever* - I gave 'em a pass b/c of what what they had accomplished 5 years prior, not now...
"other than some of cann ox, el-p's beats sound like somebody molesting a household pet" - soundsop