>The statement is hardly useless. I think it's quite valid. >Explaining it's validity would extinguish the point. I was >trying to counter the pelagic (albeit airy) blather that's >already popped up on these boards regarding Crash.
you were trying to counter airy blather by countering with equally inane diatribe?
the irony of this is beyond even some of the dumber things i've read on these boards