that you posted something as fact, and now you know it's not true, and are playing both sides in the same reply now. The stolen story isn't what I'm debating. I'm debating whether she WON or not.
>Pardon me if I posted some disreputable sources, but the truth >of the matter is, if not settled, this is an ongoing case, and >some jury(not influenced by WB thinks she has a VERY credible >case.