I'll still find it and read it, and doubtless I will enjoy it, but frankly, I find the position that it doesn't compare to any other book to be somewhat off-putting.
I haven't found Geoffrey Wolff's work to be so unusually brilliant that I would just take his word on anything, and I don't know why I would allow anyone, including you, to recommend a book with no context. Almost no one takes my book recommendations unless I give some reasoning or explanation for why I am recommending the book, despite the fact that I am very well read and that fact is pretty well known on here and elsewhere. So why should I give other people the benefit of the doubt if I am not extended the same courtesy?
Erk.
~~~~~
~ ~ ~ All meetings end in separation All acquisition ends in dispersion All life ends in death - The Buddha