>>rottentaomatoes kills your entire argument > >How? Because 1000+ opinions are worth more to me (and any >reasonable person) than yours? >
1000+ tarantino fanboys are as worthless as yours
> >>and reveals your fanboy zeal that you think you are somehow >>concealing. > >I get it now, anyone who likes anything is a fanboy and can >thus be ignored. How simple your world must be. >
anyone who is agitated and cites rottentomatoes to justify a sh*tbag movie by Tarantino is.
you wearing the shoe Fred Astaire.
> >>>Second, it's ridiculous to think that the entire >>>rottentomatoes site is composed of QT fanboys. >>> >> >>mostly > >^^^ delusional
you are, yes
> > >>>>again, your reaction is the all evidence that is needed. >>> >>>Again, you clearly don't know what evidence means. Sorry, >>but >>>neither my single opinion nor your single opinion is much >>>"evidence" for anything. >>> >>>However, the compiled ratings of 186 critics and 1048 users >>>for Grindhouse (or 31 and 543 for Death Proof alone) DOES >>>count as evidence. >> >>rottentaomatoes kills your entire argument >> >>and reveals your fanboy zeal that you think you are somehow >>concealing. > >Repetition of shitty arguments doesn't make them stronger. Go >ahead and get the last word (which is sure to be full of shit >too), I'm done with you anyway.
rottentomatoes as resource doesn't make your argument stronger or give it any validity. in fact, it kills it.