Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #5549

Subject: "RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
HiKwelity
Member since Sep 24th 2002
4119 posts
Mon Mar-24-03 07:44 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
33. "RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc"
In response to In response to 32


  

          

>This message is specifically for Aquaman:

Sorry, you got me first.

>I was reading how you so adamantly hate President Bush and
>are so anti-war. My question to you and to everyone else is
>what other options are there about stopping a ruler that not
>only ordered an attack on his own people with chemical
>weapons,

There is no question that these attacks against his own people were terrible, so don't think in any way that I am defending them. The fact remains, however, that these were Kurds attempting to kill him and overthrow the government and he was using weapons that the U.S. gave him. It's hard to say that any other leader wouldn't do the same if his life was in jeopardy.

> but also rejoiced publically after 9-11.

Muslims all across the Middle East were rejoicing, not just Saddam. Think of it this way, if you are a Kings fan and you finally see the Lakers fall, you are going to celebrate. If you are a Muslim in the Middle East and you see the country that has been killing your people for years get attacked, well you might celebrate. Again, not saying that its right, but it happens.

Is it
>your opinion that this man could not very well be the next
>Hitler if not stopped? If you don't know your history,
>Hitler started off by capturing surrounding countries. If I
>do recall Saddam did the same in '91 when he invaded
>bordering Iran.

Again, using weapons provided by the U.S. The U.S. wanted to see both nations fall but had to choose to support the lesser of the two evils, and that was Iraq. And oh yeah, what do you think Richard Perle's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" is talking about - controlling the Middle East.

The Iraqi people themselves are rejoicing
>to be rid of Saddam.

Those that are still alive. Killing people and destroying their towns is no way to liberate them.

It really bothers me when people are
>demeaning the purpose of my sister fighting in Iraq.

I don't think there is anyone on these boards that want your sister to be harmed in any way. It is possible to not support the reason why she is over there and still hope that she will be safe and come back unharmed.

These
>soldiers are out there defending our country from the threat
>of futher terrorist attacks.

There is no connection between Saddam and al-Queda and he has never made an attempt to attack any Americans except for during war time. If we really wanted to protect this country from terrorist attacks we would start doing something about the connections Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have with al-Queda that are as clear as day.

I think that Bush is doing
>what is best for the country.

I think he is doing what is in the best interests for himself and his administration.

It has nothing to do with oil
>or whatever else people are saying.

Again, check out Richard Perle's report. One of the clear strategies to maintaining global dominance is to control the majority of the world's energy sources.

For god sakes, had
>something been done about Bin Laden when he first bombed the
>world trade center when Clinton was in office that could
>have prevented 9-11!!!

Agree, something does need to be done about him. The connections between the U.S. and bin laden go back to '89. Indeed, Clinton could have done something to stop bin laden, but Bush sr and jr could have as well.

That being said this war is for
>prevention of threats to our national security. Sometimes
>when things happen you have to stand alone, and I'm glad
>that our president is taking a stand and doing something
>about a terrorist ruler.

And as we stand alone, we grow farther apart from the rest of the world, creating anti-American sentiment across the world. I don't know about you, but I'd like to see other parts of the world. I'd prefer if I didn't have to do it while fearing for my life.

I also encourage everyone to wear
>or post a yellow ribbon in support of the "real heros" out
>there in Iraq. Oh yeah, about the whole war is of the
>devil, I don't understand that. If that was the case then
>why did God help his people fight and win wars in the bible.
> The whole wall of Jericho and all of the other biblical
>wars, what about them. Well not to discredit or disrespect
>anyones religious beliefs but I've read and now I am
>speaking my mind.

You got me there. I'm not very religious. I consider myself to be quite spiritual but not religious.

I'm tired of hearing people complaining
>about how wrong war is when they aren't offering any other
>solutions.

There have been many other solutions offered, clearly it doesn't matter though. Bush has already made it widely known that he won't have it any other way.

True, if we lived in a perfect world we wouldn't
>need war, but we are nowhere near that. Let's be real.
>1on1. I'm out.

True indeed, I'm sure we would all like peace. If we are nowhere near a perfect world then that means that we have to get to work. We can't just sit back and say, well, the world is fucked up but there is nothing we can do so we might as well live with it.

The world would definitely be better off without Saddam, war is not the way to get rid of him though. A war in the name of peace is just ridiculous. Remember, being anti-war doesn't mean being pro-Saddam or anti-troops. We all pray that your sister and all of the other troops will get out of there safely and as soon as possible.

Oh yeah, there is one more thing............. it's been emotional

With war imminent, President Bush and others are already discussing plans for a post-Saddam, U.S.-occupied Iraq. What do you think?

"I'm sure there are plenty of ambitious young despots out there who would jump at the chance to rule Iraq."
Andrea Crim
Teacher

"I just hope we don't see a repeat of that mess we made a few years back when we tried to install an American ruler in America."
Bruce Wollensky
Attorney


"Can't we just get CNN to run the place?"
Martin Baines
Systems Analyst

"Whatever happens, someone should be there to film the most touching moments."
Meredith Hall
Psychologist


"We should ask ourselves what we would want if Iraq was occupying the U.S."
Ken Franklin
Bus Driver

"Oh, man, we're not gonna make Iraq the 51st state, are we?"
Dennis Doering
Landscaper





  

Printer-friendly copy


iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc. [View all] , guerilla_love, Mon Mar-24-03 03:42 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
honestly
Mar 24th 2003
1
sickening.
Mar 24th 2003
2
RE: sickening.
Mar 24th 2003
3
RE: sickening.
Mar 24th 2003
4
      RE: sickening.
Mar 24th 2003
5
      both...
Mar 24th 2003
6
      RE: both...
Mar 24th 2003
7
           RE: both...
Mar 24th 2003
9
           RE: both...
Mar 24th 2003
20
           hahaha game over
Mar 24th 2003
31
           RE: both...
Mar 25th 2003
38
      Apparently...
Mar 24th 2003
16
co-sign.
Mar 28th 2003
67
BODY COUNT LINK
Mar 24th 2003
8
RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
10
RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
11
      RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
12
           RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
13
           RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
14
                RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
15
                     RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
17
           RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 27th 2003
56
                RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 27th 2003
57
                     RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 27th 2003
59
                          RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 28th 2003
60
                               RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 28th 2003
63
RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
18
see:
Mar 24th 2003
19
ALREADY BEEN THERE DONE THAT READING
Mar 24th 2003
21
Problem -
Mar 24th 2003
34
RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
23
RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
25
someone said it on mtv or hbo or some shit.
Mar 24th 2003
35
RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
29
co-sign
Mar 24th 2003
30
I'm at a loss for words...
Mar 24th 2003
22
RE: I'm at a loss for words...
Mar 24th 2003
24
      RE: I'm at a loss for words...
Mar 24th 2003
26
           RE: I'm at a loss for words...
Mar 24th 2003
27
           RE: I'm at a loss for words... but not really
Mar 24th 2003
28
           RE: I'm at a loss for words... but not really
Mar 25th 2003
41
           RE: I'm at a loss for words... but not really
Mar 25th 2003
42
           RE: I'm at a loss for words... but not really
Mar 27th 2003
54
           RE: I'm at a loss for words...
Mar 27th 2003
55
                RE: I'm at a loss for words...
Mar 27th 2003
58
           RE: I'm at a loss for words...
Mar 30th 2003
77
RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
32
RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 24th 2003
36
RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 25th 2003
43
      RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 25th 2003
44
      RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 27th 2003
53
shouldn't bush be in the white house?
Mar 25th 2003
37
can anyone say... guantanamo bay?
Mar 25th 2003
39
thxs for the breakdown
Mar 25th 2003
40
thanks for that
Mar 26th 2003
47
RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 25th 2003
45
Killed while surrendering...
Mar 26th 2003
46
RE: Killed while surrendering...
Mar 27th 2003
49
      RE: Killed while surrendering...
Mar 27th 2003
51
           RE: Killed while surrendering...
Mar 27th 2003
52
                Speaking in circles
Mar 28th 2003
61
                     I'm Speaking in circles?
Mar 28th 2003
66
The media is sooo lopsided
Mar 26th 2003
48
RE: The media is sooo lopsided
Mar 27th 2003
50
RE: The media is sooo lopsided
Mar 29th 2003
69
RE: The media is sooo lopsided
Mar 29th 2003
73
rebut these? (Or support-your call)
Mar 28th 2003
62
RE: rebut these? (Or support-your call)
Mar 28th 2003
64
      RE: rebut these? (Or support-your call)
Mar 28th 2003
65
all you bleeding hearts!
Mar 29th 2003
68
RE: all you bleeding hearts!
Mar 29th 2003
70
      RE: all you bleeding hearts!
Mar 29th 2003
71
      RE: all you bleeding hearts!
Mar 29th 2003
72
           RE: all you bleeding hearts!
Mar 29th 2003
74
                RE: all you bleeding hearts!
Mar 29th 2003
75
                     RE: all you bleeding hearts!
Mar 30th 2003
78
RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 29th 2003
76
RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 31st 2003
79
      RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Mar 31st 2003
80
           RE: iraq: reasons for or against, soliders, safety, etc
Apr 01st 2003
83
rumsfeld's arrogance
Apr 01st 2003
81
this brought me to tears
Apr 01st 2003
82

Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #5549 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com