i think a lot of the bloggers out there paint buchannan as a facist apologist. they are wrong. in this article buchannan never says that facism is good. or that hitler was right to kill millions of people. what he does say is that the alternative, stalinism/communism, had a much worse outcome on europe because of the decisions made by the allies after WW2. i dont see how this makes him an apologist for facism. this sort of ties in to the post about the most evil dictator. perhaps FDR and Churchill were forced to chose the lesser of the two evils. Buchannan thinks they chose poorly and that claiming the eastern european countries were free since they were under stalin and not hitler was ridiculous.