Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #31965

Subject: "RE: So the English weren't colonialists?" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
BarTek
Member since Nov 10th 2002
51250 posts
Tue Dec-06-05 03:27 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
51. "RE: So the English weren't colonialists?"
In response to In response to 49


  

          

>Cop out isn't a label.

You labeled me with response no.13. I am here to tell you, that you are mistaken.

You asked about a book and I took the
>time to tell you about it. That was all it was. Then you
>respond with something silly. Of course Englishmen and other
>European countries were colonialist! Of course Western
>civilization is responsible for slavery and oppression of
>non-white people (and some white people)! Duh!

"Englishmen and other European countries", another generalization and sweeping statement. Do you know which European country I am from? Once again, you see my white skin, and you define me with a sweeping statement.

If I had a nickle for everytime a black person was offended by generalizations of the same type.

>
>I think you know that you have a colonialist p.o.v. because
>you recognize how you benefit from white privilege.
>

Please read reply no. 27, and tell me if that is a colonialist p.o.v...

Furthermore, Ofcourse I recognize how I benefit from white privelege! I would have to be born blind and deaf in order to be ignorant of it! You don't realize that you make very sweeping statements, such as the one above. So what! I realize how I benefit from my white privelege. What exactly does that prove in your opinion? How does it automatically give me a colonialist p.o.v?

>>You form absolute opinions based on the research you have
>done
>>and use it to judge people... In my opinion, that is
>ignorant
>>bigotry. All you see is my white skin, and you automatically
>>think you can apply your "evidence" to it... As long as we
>are
>>free to label eachother right?
>
>Incorrect. I do not see your white skin and I am basing my
>responses on your own words, not how white you are. I assume
>nothing about you on an online board. You wrote that you've
>been gifted this "white, priviledged skin color."

Right. It is a gift, because, it allows me to walk through doors that black folks have to fight their way through. How many times have I already said that? Also, do you know how I use my white privelege? Once again, read reply no. 27... I am not looking for a pass from you, I do not care what you think! I simply ask you to look at me with a fresh pair of eyes.

The difference lies in how the tool (White Privelege) is used. For example, one man's poison, is another man's medicine. Simply put, a liberal racist/colonialist will use his white privelege to maintain authority over people of colour. He will suppress, and oppress any type of societal growth that you can think of (economical, psychological, industrial, etc.) He will use his white privelege in order to label the man of colour, as a subordinate and deserving of oppression.

Now, a true revolutionary, will use the same white privelege to rise in the system. Reap the benefit of being "invisible", so that he can take the system down from within. Note, this revolutionary did not instill "White Privelege", he is jailed by it, just as much as you are. He does not want it, he does not want to use it to oppress people of colour. He is bound by it, simply by his white skin, simply by his birth. I used to look at my white skin with disgust, just as some people of colour were ashamed of their own skin.

>
>One of the symptoms of liberal racism/colonialism is
>avoidance. You said something that offended some people of
>color.

What did I avoid? Look, this is a post about how racist I am. Am I avoiding it? No. I said something that offended ONE person of colour, who then used his ignorance as a tool to generate public hate for me. Lol! I mean, the irony of his bigotry makes me laugh! I wonder where he learned such dirty and foul tricks!

Rather than respect their differences you attack and
>then avoid your initial response.

Tell me how I disrespected his differences, and please tell me where I avoided "your initial response". I do not even know what you mean by that, so if you could please make that clear for me. I simply called him out on his ignorance, that is the very source and essence of bigotry. There was no justification in his comment, but he chose to sweep the entire white race with a large stroke. Just as you have done. You don't even know which country I was born in, and you generalize me with "and other European countries" Ha! Let me ask you something, have you ever heard a white man say...

"and other African countries..."

How does that make you feel?

And no, I am not English.

Liberal colonialists deny
>holding a racist belief and even consciously reject the racist
>belief, but unconsciously still act in ways that show they
>still have the belief.

Your began our exchange by labeling me with reponse no. 13. You continued to label me with your generalization:

"Englishmen and other European countries"

You set the tone for this "proof" that you speak of. You set yourself up to be "Correct" based on the sweeping statements you used as the catalyst to your argument. Your grouped me with all the Englishment and "Other European countires" without having a source of fact about my roots. Your only "proof" was my skin colour because you know nothing about my roots!

Furthemore, you continue to define me as a Liberal Colonialist based on how I've spoken in this post. If you give this thread a proper read, you will find many contradictions and faults with your argument and definition of me.

Also, please provide me with examples of how I unconsciously acted in racist ways. Knowing now, that your sweeping statements take no root with me. Knowing now, that your evidence does not apply to me, because your evidence is vague, and sweeping. Please provide me with CLEAR examples and CLEAR references.

Your reactions and responses on this
>subject are proof of this.
>

Your reactions and responses on this subject, and of me, are the essence of blindness. You do not know as much as you think about this world and it's people. You do not know as much as you think about Europeans. There is something special and loving that extends beyond your very absolute and limited approach to the problem.

>BTW - Check out #44

I will.

Peace

~After 12, I'm worse than a gremlin, feed me Hip Hop and I start trembling! (c) Rakim

~Yes to Sex.. No to War.. Fighting is Frightening.. Yes to Sex.. It's so Much More Exciting! (c) BEP

http://www.myspace.com/bartek
http://www.soundclick.com/djbartek

  

Printer-friendly copy


White liberal bigotry [View all] , Pinko_Panther, Sat Dec-03-05 08:20 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
quick answer: no...
Dec 03rd 2005
1
RE: quick answer: no...
Dec 03rd 2005
2
      get the fuck outta here...
Dec 06th 2005
48
It's a simple answer really
Dec 03rd 2005
3
*dead*
Dec 04th 2005
12
      haha...this is three agreements in one week!
Dec 04th 2005
17
           Three?! WOWZERS!
Dec 04th 2005
18
                ok..maybe two...
Dec 04th 2005
22
Sorry Pinko, but this reads like little more than a cheap stunt
Dec 03rd 2005
4
Kind of agree
Dec 03rd 2005
5
Of course I'm trying to get support, how dense must you be?
Dec 04th 2005
11
      RE: Of course I'm trying to get support, how dense must you be?
Dec 04th 2005
16
           RE: Of course I'm trying to get support, how dense must you be?
Dec 04th 2005
19
                RE: Of course I'm trying to get support, how dense must you be?
Dec 04th 2005
21
iranian = aryan
Dec 03rd 2005
6
YOU IRANIAN CRACKA!!
Dec 03rd 2005
7
RE: YOU IRANIAN CRACKA!!
Dec 04th 2005
15
Yeah, Hitler got a lot of history wrong...
Dec 04th 2005
14
RE: iranian = aryan
Dec 04th 2005
20
      RE: iranian = aryan
Dec 04th 2005
23
           RE: iranian = aryan
Dec 05th 2005
36
                RE: iranian = aryan
Dec 05th 2005
41
RE: White liberal bigotry
Dec 03rd 2005
8
Sigh
Dec 03rd 2005
9
see -- this is problematic.
Dec 04th 2005
10
Yep
Dec 04th 2005
13
I find it interesting, how you are so certain...
Dec 04th 2005
29
      ???
Dec 04th 2005
30
           RE: ???
Dec 05th 2005
37
                RE: ???
Dec 05th 2005
42
                     RE: ???
Dec 05th 2005
45
                          Cop out
Dec 06th 2005
46
                               RE: Cop out
Dec 06th 2005
47
                                    So the English weren't colonialists?
Dec 06th 2005
49
                                        
                                         RE: I read #44
Dec 06th 2005
54
                                              This sounds very familiar
Dec 06th 2005
58
                                                   Ouch...
Dec 06th 2005
59
                                                   RE: Wow...
Dec 07th 2005
86
                                         what do English/liberal colonialists have to do with BarTek?
Dec 07th 2005
76
                                              RE: what do English/liberal colonialists have to do with BarTek?
Dec 07th 2005
78
                                              RE: what do English/liberal colonialists have to do with BarTek?
Dec 07th 2005
80
                                              RE: what do English/liberal colonialists have to do with BarTek?
Dec 07th 2005
81
                                                   Ah.
Dec 07th 2005
82
                                                   Wait...
Dec 07th 2005
83
                                                   Me neither
Dec 07th 2005
85
                                                   RE: what do English/liberal colonialists have to do with BarTek?
Dec 07th 2005
87
                                              RE: what do English/liberal colonialists have to do with BarTek?
Dec 07th 2005
97
                                                   You are missing the point
Dec 09th 2005
102
                                              She likes to assume that all whites are the same...
Dec 07th 2005
95
                                                   Nope
Dec 09th 2005
103
RE: see -- this is problematic.
Dec 04th 2005
24
      RE: see -- this is problematic.
Dec 04th 2005
25
      RE: see -- this is problematic.
Dec 04th 2005
27
           your own words, once again.
Dec 06th 2005
63
                RE: your own words, once again.
Dec 07th 2005
99
                RE: your own words, once again.
Dec 14th 2005
107
      word choice, Tek...
Dec 04th 2005
31
           RE: word choice, Tek...
Dec 05th 2005
35
YEP, I KNEW YOU WERE AN IDIOT!!!
Dec 23rd 2005
113
      Your mom's an idiot...
Dec 23rd 2005
115
           *pats you on the back*....ahhhh, him feelin's hurt
Dec 23rd 2005
116
                Lol, you have some serious mental issues homie...
Dec 23rd 2005
118
.
Dec 04th 2005
26
Pinko, I find it quite funny and revealing that...
Dec 04th 2005
28
Obviously, you are not aware that I am done with addressing you
Dec 04th 2005
32
      RE: Obviously, you are not aware that I am done with addressing you
Dec 05th 2005
33
           RE: Obviously, you are not aware that I am done with addressing you
Dec 05th 2005
34
           that just might be the dumbest arguement I've seen in a while. n/m
Dec 05th 2005
38
                Not to mention the fact that I inboxed him...
Dec 05th 2005
39
                RE: Yet, you fail to provide any substance...
Dec 06th 2005
52
Point of clarification about my southern white woman comment...
Dec 05th 2005
40
shit like this is honestly why white people shouldn't even
Dec 05th 2005
43
we whites need to STEP THE FUCK BACK
Dec 05th 2005
44
RE: we whites need to STEP THE FUCK BACK
Dec 06th 2005
50
lol
Dec 06th 2005
55
RE: we whites need to STEP THE FUCK BACK
Dec 06th 2005
53
I love how you alternate...
Dec 06th 2005
56
LOL
Dec 06th 2005
57
what disgusts me
Dec 06th 2005
60
      Get yourself more aquianted with the matter...
Dec 06th 2005
61
      RE: Get yourself more aquianted with the matter...
Dec 06th 2005
62
           Telling coloured folks how to conduct themselves racially...
Dec 06th 2005
67
                taking issue with ANYONE stereotyping ANYONE is not bigotry
Dec 06th 2005
71
      If it was a one time thing, we could talk
Dec 06th 2005
66
           Tell me about it!
Dec 06th 2005
69
           ah, well...
Dec 06th 2005
70
           but in no way is he being a bigot. that's what i'm taking issue with.
Dec 06th 2005
72
           ???
Dec 06th 2005
73
                RE: ???
Dec 07th 2005
75
                     RE: ???
Dec 07th 2005
77
                          regardless of how you want to spin it, the title of the post points out
Dec 07th 2005
90
           You failed to address my response to you...
Dec 07th 2005
89
Bawhahahahaha! Ouch! *laughs so hard my cigar fell out of my mouth*
Dec 07th 2005
74
hahahahahahahaha
Dec 07th 2005
79
RE: That's it?
Dec 07th 2005
88
if THAT isn't proof of penis riding, than felacio is a myth
Dec 07th 2005
92
Say WORD.
Dec 23rd 2005
111
      Do y'all talk to your girl the same way you talk to your boys?
Dec 23rd 2005
112
and at its heart, this whole argument is racist.
Dec 06th 2005
64
      I could kiss you on the mouth(c) Iverson
Dec 06th 2005
68
      RE: and at its heart, this whole argument is racist.
Dec 07th 2005
91
      RE: and at its heart, this whole argument is racist.
Dec 07th 2005
94
           See, I may be a racist (I'm not, but for arguments sake)
Dec 07th 2005
96
                RE: Before you talk to me...
Dec 07th 2005
98
yep.
Dec 06th 2005
65
what about liberal heteronormativity?
Dec 07th 2005
84
Would you like to expound?
Dec 07th 2005
93
*wins post 100*
Dec 07th 2005
100
RE: White liberal bigotry
Dec 08th 2005
101
HOLY SHIT!
Dec 13th 2005
104
T.O. is EVIL!
Dec 13th 2005
105
McNabb is SOFT!!!
Dec 13th 2005
106
Ummm
Dec 14th 2005
108
Nettrice, football is here to HELP us. Not HINDER us.
Dec 14th 2005
109
RE: Nettrice, football is here to HELP us. Not HINDER us.
Dec 16th 2005
110
Wow, please explain urself/ur colleague. I've never heard some shit lik...
Dec 23rd 2005
114
100% CO-SIGN! you illustrated my feelings EXACTLY lol.
Dec 23rd 2005
117

Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #31965 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com