>In a society where Britney Spears makes millions for
>stuffing her tits into a pushup bra and shaking her ass
>suggestively I dont think you can make any reasonable
>correlation between how good something is and the amount of
>money it takes in.
Are you serious?
Documentaries hardly ever make any real money. When one pulls in tens of millions of dollars (more than any other ever)you really cannot conclude it was shitty through and through. Something must've been done really well, whether it was the subject matter, the humour, M.M. himself, or weak competition at box office.
>
>Think about what his movies will do for the genre? Think
>about what his movies have done for the role of the
>leftwing! It only takes so much as a reference to Moore for
>any right winger to dismiss the entire stance of the
>leftwing offhand. He is a menace and a child, we all saw how
>poorly he handled his brief time on stage at the Academy
>Awards. His movies are also shit.

I'm sorry, but if Micheal Moore was such idiot why do right-wingers spend so much time trying to pick him apart. I actually think MM is on of the best things the left has got going for them right now. Personally, I think he just uses the same tactics a lot of right wingers use. I think they're just better at disguising it.

>Read what I wrote about how the left needs more critics.

***************************************
"Science" and Religion are the two most dangerous weapons of ideology. See holocaust.

Why do "scientists" constantly produce statistics based on "race", a social construct?