|
>there are plenty of countries with starving people in them >(including our own),
See post #7.
>is military invasion and violent >overthrow the proper way to address each case of this?
Did I say it was?
>the >people "celebrating" this are people who are glad to see >that DPRK's nukes are keeping "military options" (a.k.a >killing a lot of Koreans) off the table
Military options were never on the table. North Korea has a standing army of over a million soldiers, and they could flatten Seoul with conventional weapons. Nukes or no nukes, we're not invading N.Korea anytime soon. But N.Korea with nukes does make the region more dangerous, which is why the people celebrating this are retarded.
>(and, by the way, >running your country in a way in which starvation occurs is >no justification for bombing said country and killing even >MORE of its citizenry, since we have not yet invented bombs >that incinerate debris and otherwise avoid injury to >civilians or critical infrastructure, to the contrary, we go >in blowing up roads, power plants, houses, etc).
Again, I didn't say that it was.
------------------------------------------------------------- "Wearily on I go, pain and misery my only companions. And vast intelligence, of course. And infinite sorrow. I despise you all."
- Marvin the Paranoid Android
___________________
Mar-A-Lago delenda est
|