>For years people have been throwing
>around the term Revolution. In
>history class we learn about
>Revolutions, as i understand it
>a Revolution is a
>
>2 a : a sudden, radical,
>or complete change b :
>a fundamental change in political
>organization; especially : the overthrow
>or renunciation of a government
>c : activity or movement
>designed to effect fundamental changes
>in the socioeconomic situation
>
>Knowing this what would be possible
>to usher in a new
>revolution, if the saying is
>true there is no revolution
>with out bloodshed. When i
>speak of revolution i refer
>to worldwide global phenomemon, however
>unlkely that would redistribute the
>wealth in world ans institute
>a society that honors humanity,
>even though killing may contradict
>that.
>
>How could this be done?

reading your definitions I'm wondering what's the hurry? why must it be 'sudden' & 'radical'? we evidently can't/won't get enough people to throw down and say enough is enough, there's a better way..feel like that time's passed now. perhaps we need to try and reach the children and plant seeds - sht is waay out of hand already without spilt blood and that means seems to result in much the same situation it supercedes.
_______________________________________________________

Herbsman.

seize your time! - marley

best to take what you need but don't be greedy - 2pac (rip)