161. "Afrocentricism is legit on many grounds, but..." In response to In response to 159
>then I don't know what you were reading. He laid out a >theoretical framework as valid as any other framework which >he sucessfully defended by critics more comeprehensive who'd >just come up with an empty claim of "Perpetual judgement" If >that is your conclusion I say try again
Considering the Egyptian rulers were an oppressive and hideous aristocracy, it never made sense to me that Diop spoke highly of those who rebelled against them. If anything, wouldn't that be an argument against Pan-Africanism? This is just one example...
I mean, as brilliant as the work of Diop is (I thoroughly enjoy much of it), the Pan-Anything stuff is just not logical, no matter who it's pointed it. If you are the expert Diop scholar you claim to be, I would love for you to cite a passage of his that proves me wrong. I'll read whatever you would like to share. peace,