|
>>we are talking about motives.. they are either sinful or >>otherwise, correct? > >motives of what? i'm really confused at what you're talking >about.
I believe that there are three ways to deal with the politics of any relationship. Two of these ways are very sinful, or at least implicate as such:
The first is to ignore them. I believe this is the most common approach in interracial relationships, and it certainly implicates sinful motives. If the politics of any relationship are ignored completely, people are just being dishonest.
The second is to adhere to them... obviously, this is retarded.
The third is to thoroughly acknowledge that politics are there with an understanding that anything defined as political is done so by other people, and to resist their notions. From what I've read, you seem to be saying the third one is impossible to achieve, but I could be mistaken...
The first two are sinful, the last one (if it is possible, which I believe it is) is not.
>>>- historical linkages to africa. >> >>ok... how much? and at what point does someone's >>"whiteness" become anti-Black? > >someone's whiteness becomes anti-Black when whiteness is >held in equal to or greater value than Blackness. as Black >person you must understand that need to uphold and defend >your Blackness. and you can't be pro-Black and pro-white at >the same time.
I can see that, but if being pro-_____ means you want an improvement for whatever group of people, that doesn't necessarily mean that pro-Black and pro-White can't co-exist, even in the same person, IMO... I hear you though.
>so despite your blood lines, the instant the Africa in you >is suppressed, you are being anti-Black.
agreed.
>peace.
peace,
***I'm a Child of Production***
|