66. "RE: You gotta take that up with george" In response to In response to 65
>The dismantling of affirmative action is >a reality... >california, maybe?
see what i mean.
>>how is the price of not >>voting any different from the >>price of voting- do voters >>get different rights. do voters >>get to live in different >>parts of the country? > >Not voting can mean the difference >between electing bad candidate and >a worse one. You think >black people in Louisiana woulda >been happy with David Duke >as their governor? I don't >think so.
you're avoiding the question- how does the price differ for the non voter- how is there situation any different from the person who voted? If David Duke had been elected would the fact that they didnt vote for him save them any trouble?
>>CMON ZESI- how are you not >>under the whim of whoever >>is in charge of the >>government? > >Because voting still carries some weight. >Remember the Social Security example? >Don't wanna bring it up >again. And we're less under >the control of the government >than under the control of >corporate interest. >Which is a bigger machine than >government could ever be (unless >the government took over the >private sector...highly unlikely.)
still not answering the question- remember the crack import example- the story of freeway rick? who are you not under the whim of the government when most of their activity takes place without your consent or even your knowledge?
>So Koala, why don't you move?
find me a place that hasnt been threatened or ruined by this system and Ill think about it
>Planning a revolution?
what Im telling you is that many plans are already in effect- I dont need to plan one I just need to join one. This extends to all people.