>good for the children
>makes him look even worse
>
>shouldnt have a billion to give
>in the first place
>in my opinion
>
>
>
>=meaning he shoulda been giving before
>he was comfortbale enough to
>feed his whole future family
>tree and forest
>
>..peace

Exactly. What about his other 70 Billion (that's $70,000,000,000)? Anyone giving money to worthwhile project is a good thing. And this real money helps real people. But doesn't giving when it hurts mean more? Why does he need all the other money he has? Are children not still dying? It must not have hurt him that much if he couldn't spare the other $70,000,000,000.