Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #18185

Subject: "Eyezed's relativity" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
eyezed
Member since Aug 13th 2002
42 posts
Tue Feb-27-01 12:01 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
41. "Eyezed's relativity"
In response to In response to 39


          

>>If this is true, please explain.
>
>by my logic (my post, my
>logic dammit) there are two
>states, wet and dry.
>
>wet = !dry (the state called
>wet equals the state called
>not dry)
>dry = !wet (see above)
>

I like when people have their OWN logic. You've simply dispelled the idea of continuity, though. Hence, there is no difference between someone who was in the rain for .05 hours and 50 hours. They're both just wet. Otherwise you'd have to state that someone is more not dry (wet) than someone else, and that'll just open up a whole can of worms for your sequencing. Unfortunately, life doesn't work on a stream of 1's and 0's. The idea of a door being open or closed is incorrect. Just like the idea that flipping a coin and it landing heads/tails indefinitely is also incorrect. It's called the particle/wave nature of all that is matter. Since we have this tendency to fluctuate between point existence and fluid existence at a moment's notice, the coin will eventually land on neither heads nor tails. (brings a whole new meaning to being punctual!)

>>When is a human "absolutely
>>wet"
>
>when they are dry
>
>>You said "as i was thinking,
>>even if you have the
>>slightest degree of wetness you
>>still aren't dry". Isn't the
>>reciprocal true? If you have
>>the slightest degree of dryness,
>>you still aren't wet.
>
>perhaps were dancing (it's been a
>minute since i exercised this
>brainstem), but is the reciprocal
>the same as the converse?
>
Are you talking about the converse or the contrapositive? Just kidding. I think I explained above.

>>Which leads us to an
>>unarguable point that absolutes don't
>>exist in the current universe.
>
>isn't it an absolute to say
>that absolutes don't exist?
>
>same arguement, different person.
>

You're right! That is the most contradictory thing I think I've ever read. What kind of an idiot am I? I could try to rephrase, but it'll be just that "re-phrasing". I was really just trying to trick you into giving me an example of an absolute.


>this is fun. we all nerds
>(reatively that is). recognize.

I hope that doesn't get out.

  

Printer-friendly copy


My Religion/Faith Post [View all] , BooDaah, Mon Feb-26-01 10:46 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
try this one
Feb 26th 2001
1
insert "wink" here
Feb 26th 2001
2
      ...and
Feb 26th 2001
3
      here's another one for you
Feb 26th 2001
7
           ...
Feb 26th 2001
8
                zackly n/m
Feb 26th 2001
10
                where i came up with that idea
Feb 26th 2001
11
                but player
Feb 26th 2001
14
                     it's true that i have no business discussin
Feb 26th 2001
16
                     psalms
Feb 26th 2001
17
                ok but...
Feb 27th 2001
21
                     ....
Feb 27th 2001
24
                          for once we agree
Feb 27th 2001
26
      no, no
Feb 26th 2001
4
           addendum, like anyone cares
Feb 27th 2001
34
                great quote n/m
Feb 27th 2001
36
                hm....
Feb 27th 2001
37
all the facts is backwards
Feb 26th 2001
5
that's not true
Feb 26th 2001
9
      TRUTH
Feb 26th 2001
13
      ..
Feb 26th 2001
15
           ALL IS ONE
Feb 26th 2001
19
           cloudy
Feb 27th 2001
20
           I did
Feb 27th 2001
43
                sure why not.
Feb 27th 2001
44
                Word UP!!
Feb 27th 2001
46
                KMT called himTehuti (Thoth)
Feb 27th 2001
48
                     And I know this....
Feb 28th 2001
59
                go 'head...
Feb 28th 2001
57
           RE: ALL IS ONE
utamaroho
Feb 27th 2001
23
                you talk a bunch of stuff
Feb 27th 2001
25
           Instantly Dry!!!
Feb 27th 2001
28
                wow
Feb 27th 2001
29
                i dunno
Feb 27th 2001
31
                     Physics 101
Feb 27th 2001
35
                          RE: Physics 101
Feb 27th 2001
39
                              
                                    what i REALLY love...
Feb 27th 2001
42
                                    interesting
Feb 27th 2001
45
                                         Huh?
Feb 27th 2001
47
      you want to get literal
Feb 27th 2001
22
      ..
Feb 27th 2001
27
      that's not true BOODAAH
Feb 27th 2001
50
           never that
Feb 27th 2001
51
Word!!!!!! n/m
Feb 26th 2001
6
In my op...
Feb 26th 2001
12
well, then
Feb 26th 2001
18
RE: My Religion/Faith Post
Feb 27th 2001
30
my $.02
audiovisuals
Feb 27th 2001
32
mystikal says: DANGER!!!!
Feb 27th 2001
33
      hey, that's them
audiovisuals
Feb 28th 2001
58
i used to be like that....
Feb 27th 2001
38
i feel ya
Feb 27th 2001
40
      RE: i feel ya
Feb 27th 2001
55
           ..
Feb 28th 2001
61
           "Straight way"
Feb 28th 2001
62
RE: My Religion/Faith Post
Feb 27th 2001
49
RE: My Religion/Faith Post
Feb 27th 2001
52
RE:boodah, you are a...
Feb 27th 2001
53
RE: My Religion/Faith Post
Feb 27th 2001
54
And..
Feb 27th 2001
56
      THIS is what i'm talking about
Feb 28th 2001
60

Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #18185 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com