Question:
Even if there isn't direct bribery - that is, even if we can't find proof - don't you think that there's more than a few coincidences that we should be taking a look at?

I mean, we know for a fact that Clinton isn't exactly the most correct president on the block - look at the way he spent his last few months in office.

Even if it's not bribery, there's something fishy. And that ought to be looked into. The president(and ex-presidents) need to be just as accountable as american citizens. Period.

Final note: Just because there aren't any restraints on the presidential pardons DOESN'T mean that responsibility doesn't go with that power. While he can legally pardon whoever, that doesn't mean he's not held accountable outside a legal spectrum.


-thebigfunk

-thebigfunk

~ i could still snort you under the table ~