Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #1456

Subject: "more evidence of GM dangers" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
zewari
Charter member
7113 posts
Mon May-10-04 06:57 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
47. "more evidence of GM dangers"
In response to In response to 15


  

          

article from the guardian:
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/environment/story.jsp?story=498693

Revealed: Shocking new evidence of the dangers of GM crops
Genetically modified strains have contaminated two-thirds of all crops in US
By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor
07 March 2004

More than two-thirds of conventional crops in the United States are now contaminated with genetically modified material - dooming organic agriculture and posing a severe future risk to health - a new report concludes.

The report - which comes as English ministers are on the verge of approving the planting of Britain's first GM crop, maize - concludes that traditional varieties of seed are "pervasively contaminated" by genetically engineered DNA. The US biotech industry says it is "not surprised" by the findings.

NZ Herald

07.03.2004
6.00pm - By GEOFFREY LEAN
Because of the contamination, the report says, farmers unwittingly plant billions of GM seeds a year, spreading genetic modification throughout US agriculture. This would be likely to lead to danger to health with the next generation of GM crops, bred to produce pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals - delivering "drug-laced cornflakes" to the breakfast table.

The report comes at the worst possible time for the English Government, which is trying to overcome strong resistance from the Scottish and Welsh administrations to GM maize.

The House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee drew attention to the problem in North America in a report published on Friday, and said the Government had not paid enough attention to it. The MPs concluded: "No decision to proceed with the commercial growing of GM crops should be made until thorough research into the experience with GM crops in North America has been completed and published". It would be "irresponsible" for ministers to give the green light to the maize without further tests.

Peter Ainsworth, the committee chairman, accuses the Cabinet of "great discourtesy" to Parliament by making its decision on the maize last Thursday, the day before the report came out, and plans to raise the issue with the Speaker of the House.

This week's statement by Margaret Beckett, Secretary of State for the Environment, is expected to fall short of authorising immediate planting of the maize, and provide only a muted endorsement for the technology. She will make it clear that the Government wants the GM industry to compensate farmers whose crops are contaminated. This could make cultivation uncommercial. The US study will increase the pressure on her to be tough.

Under the auspices of the green-tinged Union of Concerned Scientists, two separate independent laboratories tested supposedly non-GM seeds "representing a substantial proportion of the traditional seed supply" for maize, soya and oilseed rape, the three crops whose modified equivalents are grown widely in the United States.

The test found that at "the most conservative expression", half the maize and soyabeans and 83 per cent of the oilseed rape were contaminated with GM genes - just eight years after the modified varieties were first cultivated on a large scale in the US.

The degree of contamination is thought to be at a relatively low level of about 0.5 to 1 per cent. The reports says that "contamination ... is endemic to the system". It adds: "Heedlessly allowing the contamination of traditional plant varieties with genetically engineered sequences amounts to a huge wager on our ability to understand a complicated technology that manipulates life at the most elemental level." There could be "serious risks to health" if drugs and industrial chemicals from the next generation of GM crops got into food.

Lisa Dry, of the US Biotechnology Industry Association, said that the industry was "not surprised by this report, knowing that pollen travels and commodity grains might co-mingle at various places".

_¸»¬æ¤º²°¯¯°²º¤æ¬«¸_SiG_¸»¬æ¤º²°¯¯°²º¤æ¬«¸_

www.absurdtheater.org

“Stand out firmly for Justice as witness before God, even against yourselves, against your kin and against your parents, against people who are rich or poor. Do not follow your inclinations or desires lest you deviate from Justice. Remember, God is the best of Protectors and well acquainted with all that you do.”
-Qur’an 4:135

"Don't be deceived when they tell you things are better now. Even if there's no poverty to be seen because the poverty's been hidden. Even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which industries foist on you and even if it seems to you that you never had so much, that is only the slogan of those who still have much more than you. Don't be taken in when they paternally pat you on the shoulder and say that there's no inequality worth speaking of and no more reason to fight because if you believe them they will be completely in charge in their marble homes and granite banks from which they rob the people of the world under the pretence of bringing them culture. Watch out, for as soon as it pleases them they'll send you out to protect their gold in wars whose weapons, rapidly developed by servile scientists, will become more and more deadly until they can with a flick of the finger tear a million of you to pieces."
--Jean Paul Marat, 18th Century French Visionary (and revolutionary), murdered in his bathtub by Royalist Charlotte Corday

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
-- Johann W. von Goethe

__________________________

www.supportblackowned.org

  

Printer-friendly copy


whats the big deal about GM crops.. [View all] , brainsoup, Fri May-07-04 02:31 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
RE: whats the big deal about GM crops..
May 07th 2004
1
check this out...
May 07th 2004
3
like he said....
May 07th 2004
2
yes i read that article..
May 07th 2004
4
      RE: yes i read that article..
May 07th 2004
5
      RE: yes i read that article..
May 07th 2004
6
           how so..?
May 07th 2004
7
                hmmm...
May 07th 2004
8
                RE: hmmm...
May 07th 2004
10
                     a warm feeling
May 07th 2004
11
                     your source is
May 07th 2004
12
                     RE: hmmm...
May 07th 2004
13
                RE: how so..?
mcneter
May 07th 2004
14
a side issue here, since it deals with same MNCs
May 07th 2004
9
an article i once wrote on GM
May 07th 2004
15
RE: whats the big deal about GM crops..
May 07th 2004
16
ah yes-so simple
May 07th 2004
17
      RE: ah yes-so simple
May 07th 2004
18
           RE: ah yes-so simple
May 07th 2004
19
           check response #15 for answer to your ? n/m
May 07th 2004
20
           ok... so you think GM should be banned?
May 07th 2004
21
                avoid the cliche references...
May 07th 2004
22
                What's wrong with GM foods is...
May 08th 2004
24
                plant/animal breeding?
May 08th 2004
26
                     There is a clear and distinct difference here,
May 08th 2004
29
                          i dont see much of a difference at all
May 08th 2004
30
                               Ok, maybe I can offer this as an example
May 08th 2004
31
                                    i understand you arguement
May 08th 2004
32
                                         You disagree,
May 08th 2004
33
                RE: ok... so you think GM should be banned?
May 11th 2004
50
           RE: ah yes-so simple
May 08th 2004
23
                see response 15 n/m
May 08th 2004
34
                How can you tell this?
May 08th 2004
35
                     on my "shortsighted silliness"
May 08th 2004
38
                          maybe not
May 08th 2004
42
                               no...
May 08th 2004
43
                                    I'm disappointed,
May 08th 2004
45
                                         RE: I'm disappointed,
May 11th 2004
51
                                              Just curious,
May 13th 2004
52
there is nothing wrong with GM crops
May 08th 2004
25
RE: there is nothing wrong with GM crops
May 08th 2004
27
      answers
May 08th 2004
28
           I hope that you are available 20-30 years
May 08th 2004
36
           i will be
May 08th 2004
39
           RE: answers
May 08th 2004
37
                answers II
May 08th 2004
40
                     thankyou..
May 08th 2004
41
                          you're quite welcome
May 08th 2004
44
about the only time i don't trust scientists
May 08th 2004
46
excellent point
May 10th 2004
48
using this post to look at my avatar image
May 10th 2004
49

Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #1456 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com