>i understand. and from MY experience
>i found it MUCH better
>than going to the family
>doctor, because that person DIDN'T
>know me, my moms, and
>it was easier for me
>to talk to the physician
>and also not worry about
>my moms finding out...
>
anonimity is great, isn't it? but a lot of upper class teenagers have the right of doctor/patient priviledge. the parent's aren't notified unless there's a major problem.
>
>>i simply said that being wealthy affords an access to more >effective forms of birth control and information.
>
>again define "effective". do they have
>different grades of educational information
>at a planned parent hood
>than a private facility? from
>my personal experience they pretty
>much tell you and offer
>the EXACT same thing.
>
not really. from my experience there are various other methods of birth control that are offered to the upper class that you'll never hear about at planned parenthood. the reason being: COST.

>>for example: how many of your "rich friends" are using the
>>norplant?
>
>i know NO ONE using norplant,
>your point is?
>
my point is i do know of people who are on the norplant. and they're all poor, and of color. doctor's convince these uninformed sistas to use a product that's still experimental. you'll never see that at a private physician's office for the upper class.

>>so, the tuskeegee experiments weren't based on race? you might >wanna think about that one.
>
>there's NO comparison between saying if
>you jump up and down
>after sex you can't get
>pregnant, and the tuskeegee experiment..or
>maybe there's something IM missing?
>
you're not missing anything. as usual, you're right on point. what a woman.

inaugural member - okayplayer sports hall of fame.


what i'm digging right now:

chocolate butterfly - self-titled
laura jane - welcome to my planet boo
me & this japanese guy - waiting for the miracle
wade3 - dreams
tracey amos - who are we really?