>It's a particular weapon that probably CAN be stopped, by >destroying the system that makes them. What I'm saying is... >TERRORISM is a relatively organic product of the situation, >but not suicide bombing.
Well... Probably.
> hopeless, despairing people commit suicide >so they assume it must be hopeless, despairing people who >commit suicide bombing >but lots of reports I've read suggest the suicide bombers >had families to live for.
yeah many had families to live for.
Sometimes they have family members who died or directly suffered from oppression. So it's revenge. Remember most of them are what ? 20 years old ?
And then. Let's not forget that the family of a Kamikaze is often token care of..
>but still no one "has to" blow themselves up. The Russian >fighting was desperate but it wasn't deliberately suicidal
Oh yeah ? Then no you're wrong.
- There were the assaults in which 1 out of 2 men had a weapon. The other one just run towards is death. - WW1: for 6 months. Every morning, Russian Troops assaulted the Prussians AT THE SAME EXACT HOUR. 300 guys deep. Never any survivor. The ones that decided to go back to the Russian camp were executed. How is that NOT SUICIDE ??? - and yes there was random bombing in occupied parts of USSR - and yes some people did things as crazy as attacking a SS Colonel with a sword. the goal was to kill him EVEN if they knew they had to die.