>Between the original Macintosh, iMac, iPod, iPhone, etc,
>they've always been on the cutting edge of computing for
>consumers.

Look at the launch of almost any of those products and you not see the word s"innovate" or "invent" you'll see coverage filled "Apple demands you follow only it's choices" and "Apple wants to much control over your life."


>But maybe this article gets at something that hasn't been said
>since Jobs died, is that Apple hasn't create the NEXT GREAT
>PRODUCT in the time since his passing. For the most part the
>company has iterated and cleaned up a lot of visual design of
>their products (MacOS, iOS) but the iPad seems stale as does
>the Macbook line.

Jesus, EVERY ARTICLE Written since Jobs died has said this. ALL OF THEM. Really, every single one.

>But the Surface Pro's are more complete products than both the
>Macbooks and iPad and some of the decisions to cannibalize
>some of their products (iPad Pro and Macbook Air) and other
>changes in approaches that Jobs likely wouldn't have made have
>at least created a seed of doubt in their RDF.

So it's Apple innovative ever, or is it always RDF?

In anycase only time and profit will tell, If Apple starts TANKING then they'll have made the wrong choices.

------------


Gone: My Discogs collection for The Roots:
http://www.discogs.com/user/tomhayes-roots/collection