>based on being in a store for ten minutes?
>
>Not to mention Amazon is the world's largest online retailer,
>basically the Wal-Mart of the internet...but no, their numbers
>are much less important than being in two stores for a total
>of twenty minutes and comparing based on that.

I didn't say it was becuase it was amazon. I said it's because top twenty list and the way it works isn't at all relevant to stats over an entire month. it's just stupid.

what you would be able to observe in either store in just ten minutes, is that the the demographics are much more alike than you've suggested. It probably matters a lot more WHERE the store is, and what is around it, than what kind of store it is. but fuckit, why argue the shit sensibly, when you could lamely suggest that nintendo is getting jobbed by NPD.


>
>Next time you type something, why don't you step away for ten
>minutes, then come back and read it again to make sure you
>aren't saying something retarded.
>
>After the retard test, you need to re-read what I wrote to
>make sure you got the point. You clearly missed it this time;
>all I said was that I'd like to read about the NPD's methods
>for retail tracking, since that would be a lot more important
>than finding out about VG Chartz.
>
>Which brings us to this:
>
>
>>actually - you can read up on the npds methodology.
>
>If there was something on the methodology of NPD, you could
>have said so after the first damn post I made instead of going
>on a rant about VG Chartz not being legit!
>
>
>I swear, it's like you just want to argue. Even saying "google
>it" © RJCC would be fine in this case.

GOOGLE THAT SHIT


>
>
>
>


FREE CHAI VANG!

YOU'VE READ MY FILE NIGGA (c) Jack 'Mufuckin' Bauer



www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at